ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2004
Predictors of cognitive appraisals following genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.
Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Randomized controlled trial of a psychosocial telephone counseling intervention in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2010Trial
- Effects of Hormonal Replacement Therapy and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on Climacteric Symptoms Following Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Uncertainty following an inconclusive result from the BRCA1/2 genetic test: A review about psychological outcomes.World journal of psychiatry · 2021Article
- Black Women's Confidence in the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Understanding Medical Mistrust in Black Women at Risk of BRCA 1/2 Mutations.Journal of health disparities research and practice · 2019Article
- Information and support needs of young women regarding breast cancer risk and genetic testing: adapting effective interventions for a novel population.Familial cancer · 2018Article
- The Role of Knowledge on Genetic Counseling and Testing in Black Cancer Survivors at Increased Risk of Carrying a BRCA1/2 Mutation.Journal of genetic counseling · 2017Article
- Modeling the dyadic effects of parenting, stress, and coping on parent-child communication in families tested for hereditary breast-ovarian cancer risk.Familial cancer · 2016Article
- Women's concerns about the emotional impact of awareness of heritable breast cancer risk and its implications for their children.Journal of community genetics · 2015Article
- Women's experience of telehealth cancer genetic counseling.Journal of genetic counseling · 2010Article
- Sociocultural determinants of men's reactions to prostate cancer diagnosis.Psycho-oncology · 2010Article
- Women's perceptions of the personal and family impact of genetic cancer risk assessment: focus group findings.Journal of genetic counseling · 2010Article
- Distress among women receiving uninformative BRCA1/2 results: 12-month outcomes.Psycho-oncology · 2009Article
- Predictors of decision making in families at risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2009Article
- Decisions to participate in fragile X and other genomics-related research: Native American and African American voices.Journal of cultural diversity · 2009Article
- Risk perception and cancer worries in families at increased risk of familial breast/ovarian cancer.Psycho-oncology · 2008Article
- How do women decide? Accepting or declining BRCA1/2 testing in a nationwide clinical sample in the United States.Community genetics · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The objectives of this study were (1) to describe perceptions of stress and confidence following genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) mutations and (2) to identify predictors of these processes. Participants were 130 high-risk women affected with cancer who received BRCA1/2 test results. Individual difference characteristics and interpersonal factors were measured by self-report before genetic counseling and perceptions of stress and confidence were evaluated by self-report 1 month following disclosure of test results. BRCA1/2 test results had a significant effect only on perceptions of stress (beta = 0.38, p = 0.0001), while trait anxiety had a significant effect on both perceptions of stress (beta = 0.44, p = 0.0001) and confidence (beta = -0.41, p = 0.001). These results suggest that interventions designed to address perceptions of stress related to medical decision-making and familial concerns may need to be targeted to BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and individuals who are highly anxious.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.