Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15558078›Full record

ReviewMolecular psychiatry2005

Lithium and bipolar mood disorder: the inositol-depletion hypothesis revisited.

A J Harwood

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular psychiatry, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Metformin and Myo-Inositol: A Comparative Analysis.Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Potential Use of Ebselen in Treatment-Resistant Depression.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

A J HarwoodMRC Laboratory for Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, University College London, London, UK. a.harwood@ucl.ac.uk
MRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inositol, a simple six-carbon sugar, forms the basis of a number of important intracellular signaling molecules. Over the last 35 years, a series of biochemical and cell biological experiments have shown that lithium (Li(+)) reduces the cellular concentration of myo-inositol and as a consequence attenuates signaling within the cell. Based on these observations, inositol-depletion was proposed as a therapeutic mechanism in the treatment of bipolar mood disorder. Recent results have added significant new dimensions to the original hypothesis. However, despite a number of clinical studies, this hypothesis still remains to be either proven or refuted. In this review of our current knowledge, I will consider where the inositol-depletion hypothesis stands today and how it may be further investigated in the future.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimanic AgentsBipolar DisorderBrainHumansInositolLithium CompoundsSignal TransductionValproic AcidAntimanic AgentsInositolLithium CompoundsValproic Acid

Identifiers

PMID15558078
OpenAlexW2019176798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.