Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15556985›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2005

The effect of cellular receptor diffusion on receptor-mediated viral binding using Brownian adhesive dynamics (BRAD) simulations.

Thomas J English, Daniel A Hammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Significance of Receptor Mobility in Multivalent Binding on Lipid Membranes.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Computational methods to study enveloped viral entry.Biochemical Society transactions · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Evolution of Multivalent Nanoparticle Adhesion via Specific Molecular Interactions.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2016
    Article
  7. Endocytosis of viruses and bacteria.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014
    Review
  8. Adhesive dynamics.Journal of biomechanical engineering · 2014
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas J EnglishDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Daniel A Hammer

Funding

DETERMINANTS OF DYNAMICS OF CELL ADHESION UNDER FLOWR01EB000256 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HAMMER, DANIEL A · 2002 to 2003
$453k
NIBIB NIH HHS EB00256NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brownian adhesive dynamics (BRAD) is a new method for simulating the attachment of viruses to cell surfaces. In BRAD, the motion of the virus is subject to stochastic bond formation and breakage, and thermal motion owing to collisions from the solvent. In the model, the virus is approximated as a rigid sphere and the cell surface is approximated as a rigid plane coated with receptors. In this article, we extend BRAD to allow for the mobility of receptors in the plane of the membrane, both before and after they are ligated by viral attachment proteins. Allowing the proteins to move within the membrane produced several differences in behavior from when the receptors are immobilized. First, the mean steady-state bond number is unaffected by changes in cellular receptor density because proteins are now free to diffuse into the contact area, and the extent of binding is dictated by the availability of viral attachment proteins. Second, the time required to reach steady-state binding increases as both the cellular receptor number decreases and the receptor mobility decreases. This is because receptor diffusion is a slower process than the binding kinetics of the proteins. Decreasing the rate of protein binding was found to decrease the fraction of viruses bound to steady state, but not the extent of binding for those viruses that were bound. Increasing the binding rate increased the fraction of viruses bound, until no further viruses could bind. Alterations in receptor binding kinetics had no discernable effect on the mean steady-state bond number between virus and cell, because interactions were of sufficiently high affinity that all available receptor-viral attachment proteins were destined to bind at steady state.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalModels, ChemicalAlgorithmsCD4 AntigensComputer SimulationDiffusionHIVHIV Envelope Protein gp120Protein BindingReceptors, VirusCD4 AntigensHIV Envelope Protein gp120Receptors, Virus

Identifiers

PMID15556985
PMCPMC1305223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.