Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15554750›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2004

The treatment of chronic constipation in elderly people: an update.

Wanda Bosshard, Rebecca Dreher, Jean-François Schnegg, Christophe J Büla

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification of Potential Diuretic and Laxative Drug Candidates fromEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Constipation in specialized palliative care: factors related to constipation when applying different definitions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Lubiprostone in constipation: clinical evidence and place in therapy.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2015
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Constipation in adults: diagnosis and management.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2014
    Article
  19. Common GI Drug Interactions in the Elderly.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wanda BosshardDivision of Geriatric Medicine and Geriatric Rehabilitation, Department of Internal Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Rebecca Dreher
Jean-François Schnegg
Christophe J Büla
University Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Constipation is a common problem in elderly persons, with prevalence ranging from 15% to 20% in the community-dwelling elderly population and up to 50% in some studies of nursing home residents. In these patients, constipation results from a combination of risk factors, such as reduced fibre and fluid intake, decreased physical activity resulting from chronic diseases and multiple medications. Despite the high prevalence of constipation, there is surprisingly little evidence available on which to base management decisions of this common condition. Increased fluid intake, regular physical activity and high fibre intake are usually proposed as first step nonpharmacological measures. However, adherence to these measures is limited and pharmacological treatment is frequently required. Data are too limited, especially in elderly persons, to formally recommend one class of laxatives over another or one agent over another within each class. However, bulk-forming and osmotic laxatives are usually recommended as first-line agents, even though data on their effectiveness are limited. The need to maintain good hydration is a limitation in the use of bulk-forming laxatives, in particular, in frail elderly patients. In these patients, polyethylene glycol, an osmotic agent, is an attractive alternative. In addition, it has been shown to relieve faecal impaction in frail patients with neurological disease. Its cost and potential danger in patients at high risk for aspiration is, however, a limitation. Stimulant laxatives are considered mainly as an intermittent treatment in patients who do not respond to bulk-forming or osmotic laxatives. Several promising compounds such as the new serotonin 5-HT4 receptor agonists (tegaserod, prucalopride) and neurotrophin-3 (NT3) have not been adequately tested in older individuals. They are not routinely used and their role in the management of constipation in these patients will be more precisely defined in the future. Other treatment options are available (acupuncture, biofeedback, botulinum toxin and surgery), but experience with these interventions in elderly patients is limited and their indications in this population remain to be clarified. Management of constipation in elderly persons depends largely on experience and beliefs. Several new compounds seem promising but will need to be specifically tested in this population before being recommended.

Indexed as

AgedChronic DiseaseConstipationHumans

Identifiers

PMID15554750
OpenAlexW2142101231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.