Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15550535›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2005

Ultrasound guided synovial biopsy using portal and forceps.

J M Koski, M Helle

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TScience immunology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. US-Guided Biopsies: Overarching Principles.Frontiers in medicine · 2019
    Review
  11. Clinical Applications of Synovial Biopsy.Frontiers in medicine · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Is there a role of synovial biopsy in drug development?BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2016
    Review
  19. Ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy.The British journal of radiology · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J M KoskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mikkeli Central Hospital, Porrassalmenkatu 35-37, FIN-50100 Mikkeli, Finland. f.koski@fimnet.fi
M Helle
Moisio Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe a new method for taking a synovial biopsy specimen under ultrasound guidance using portal and forceps.

methodsPercutaneous ultrasound guided biopsy was performed for 37 patients with mono- or polyarthritis as outpatients. A portal to a planned area was built using a needle, guiding wire, and dilators, through which forceps could be inserted and samples taken. Biopsy samples were taken from small and large joints, bursae, and tendon sheaths.

resultsRepresentative synovial tissue in adequate amounts for histopathological evaluation was obtained in 33/37 cases--a success rate of 89%. The biopsy procedures were well tolerated, but one complication of skin infection was encountered.

conclusionThe new method of synovium biopsy under ultrasound guidance using sheath introducer set and flexible forceps can be performed on most joints and even bursae and tendon sheaths. The method gives sufficient samples for clinical work in most cases, but further work is needed before accepting this promising technique for scientific purposes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedArthritisBiopsyFemaleHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedSynovial MembraneTendonsUltrasonography, Interventional

Identifiers

PMID15550535
PMCPMC1755510
OpenAlexW2035740893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.