Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15549427›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2005

Current practice and knowledge of oral care for cancer patients: a survey of supportive health care providers.

Gerry J Barker, Joel B Epstein, Karen B Williams, Meir Gorsky, Judith E Raber-Durlacher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Oral health in cancer patients: results of a monocentric survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The effect of preventive oral care on treatment outcomes of a cohort of oral cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Comparison of different criteria for periodontitis case definition in head and neck cancer individuals.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Oral complaints and dental care of haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: a qualitative survey of patients and their dentists.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2015
    Article
  18. Appropriate and necessary oral care for people with cancer: guidance to obtain the right oral and dental care at the right time.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gerry J BarkerDepartment of Dental Public Health and Behavioral Science School of Dentistry, University of Missouri Kansas City, 650 E 25th Street, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. barkerg@umkc.edu
Joel B Epstein
Karen B Williams
Meir Gorsky
Judith E Raber-Durlacher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Oral Care Study Section of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and the International Society for Oral Oncology (ISOO) conducted a survey on clinical practices of oral/dental management of cancer patients among supportive health care providers. The main purpose was to evaluate the knowledge and current practice for preventing and managing oral side effects associated with intensive chemotherapy (ICT), hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), and radiation therapy to the head and neck (H&N RT). MATERIALS AND

methodsA questionnaire designed and pretested was sent to 212 MASCC/ISOO members around the world with different dental and medical backgrounds. MAIN

resultsSeventy-four individuals (35%) responded. The majority of respondents were aware of possible oral complications and provided patients with clinical strategies and recommendations although there was considerable variability among the respondents. Approximately 75% stated that patients were referred for oral/dental care prior to H&N RT and ICT including HCT. However, integrated dental and medical services were reported available in only about 25% of the institutions, and most patients were referred to community-based dental professionals. MAIN

conclusionsThe survey represents a first review of current, international oral care practices. It suggests a need to develop evidence-based clinical guidelines to support effective oral/dental interventions and management strategies for this population. Furthermore, strategies for implementation of oral care protocols and better integration of dental and medical services should be developed. Caution in interpreting these findings is urged due to the limited response rate.

Indexed as

Practice Patterns, Physicians'Antineoplastic AgentsGastric MucosaHead and Neck NeoplasmsHealth Care SurveysHumansInflammationIntestinal MucosaMouth DiseasesMouth MucosaNeoplasmsOral HealthOral HygieneRadiotherapyReferral and ConsultationAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.