Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15549408›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2005

A realistic chance for gene therapy in the near future.

Stefan Worgall

Abstract readEditorialReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gene therapy of benign gynecological diseases.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2009
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Gene therapeutics for periodontal regenerative medicine.Dental clinics of North America · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Stefan Worgall

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The expanding knowledge of the genetic and cellular mechanisms of human diseases in the post-genomic era coupled with the development of different vector systems to efficiently transfer genes to a variety of cell types and organs in vivo gave rise to the concept of gene therapy as a promising therapeutic option for genetic and acquired diseases. Gene therapy has been the focus of both enthusiasm and critique in the past years. Major progress has been achieved in evaluating gene therapy in clinical trials. However, a number of hurdles must still be overcome to make gene therapy safe and applicable for human diseases. Increased knowledge of the interaction of the gene therapy vehicles with the host has resulted in modifications of existing and the development of new vector systems, as well as adjustments of future clinical applications. Adeno-associated virus vectors, retrovirus- and lentivirus-based vectors show great promise for the correction of monogenic diseases. Correction of the genetic defect can be attempted by either in vivo administration to directly target a diseased organ or by administration of ex vivo genetically modified cells, e.g., bone marrow stem cells. The lack of persistent expression and the immune responses of the host have limited the use of adenovirus vectors for the permanent correction of monogenic diseases. However, the ease of production and the number of cell types and organs that can be efficiently infected make adenovirus-based vectors a promising tool for applications where permanent gene expression is not the therapeutic goal or where the induction of immune responses is the desired response, as for genetic vaccines. Overall, gene therapy remains promising for the correction of genetic as well as acquired disorders, where permanent or transient expression of a gene product will be therapeutic.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumansKidney Diseases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.