ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility2004
Detubulation experiments localise delayed rectifier currents to the surface membrane of amphibian skeletal muscle fibres.
Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Loose-patch clamp analysis applied to voltage-gated ionic currents following pharmacological ryanodine receptor modulation in murine hippocampal cornu ammonis-1 pyramidal neurons.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Murine Electrophysiological Models of Cardiac Arrhythmogenesis.Physiological reviews · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Ionic currents in intact and detubulated frog sartorius muscle fibres were compared at room temperature using a loose-patch voltage clamp configuration in four experimental groups. The test fibres (i) were detubulated by a previously established osmotic shock protocol that involved the introduction and withdrawal of extracellular glycerol followed by exposure to Ca2+/Mg2+-Ringer solution and cooling. The control fibres were spared osmotic shock and (ii) simply studied in normal Ringer solution, (iii) exposed to 30 min of steady cooling to 9-10 degrees C before electrophysiological study or (iv) exposed to and studied in glycerol-Ringer solution. The presence or absence of detubulation was confirmed for all the experimental groups through assessing for the abolition or otherwise of the delayed after-depolarisation normally associated with action potential propagation into the transverse (T) tubules. All fibre groups showed similar resting potentials (-80 to -90 mV) thus ensuring consistent baseline voltages from which the voltage clamp steps were imposed. The intact muscle fibres in the three control groups (ii)-(iv) spared osmotic shock showed both inward Na+ and delayed rectifier outward (K+) currents. In contrast, patches from detubulated muscle fibres in the test group (i) showed only delayed outward currents, consistent with contrasting contributions to Na+ and K+ currents from regions of membrane affected or spared by the detubulation procedure. Nevertheless, the voltage dependence, maximum steady state amplitudes and timecourses of the delayed outward currents were conserved through all the experimental groups. These findings suggest that the surface as opposed to the tubular membrane contributes the greater part of the delayed rectifier current in amphibian skeletal muscle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.