Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15547060›Full record

Trial reportJournal of epidemiology and community health2004

Cost effectiveness of a community based exercise programme in over 65 year olds: cluster randomised trial.

James F Munro, Jon P Nicholl, John E Brazier, Rachel Davey, Tom Cochrane

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Are physical activity interventions in primary care and the community cost-effective? A systematic review of the evidence.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2011
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Effectiveness of exercise-referral schemes to promote physical activity in adults: systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007
    Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James F MunroMedical Care Research Unit, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK. j.f.munro@sheffield.ac.uk
Jon P Nicholl
John E Brazier
Rachel Davey
Tom Cochrane
University of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Staffordshire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the cost effectiveness of a community based exercise programme as a population wide public health intervention for older adults.

designPragmatic, cluster randomised community intervention trial.

setting12 general practices in Sheffield; four randomly selected as intervention populations, and eight as control populations.

participantsAll those aged 65 and over in the least active four fifths of the population responding to a baseline survey. There were 2283 eligible participants from intervention practices and 4137 from control practices.

interventionEligible subjects were invited to free locally held exercise classes, made available for two years.

main outcome measuresAll cause and exercise related cause specific mortality and hospital service use at two years, and health status assessed at baseline, one, and two years using the SF-36. A cost utility analysis was also undertaken.

resultsTwenty six per cent of the eligible intervention practice population attended one or more exercise sessions. There were no significant differences in mortality rates, survival times, or admissions. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients in intervention practices had a lower decline in health status, although this reached significance only for the energy dimension and two composite scores (p<0.05). The incremental average QALY gain of 0.011 per person in the intervention population resulted in an incremental cost per QALY ratio of 17 174 (95% CI = 8300 to 87 120).

conclusionsDespite a low level of adherence to the exercise programme, there were significant gains in health related quality of life. The programme was more cost effective than many existing medical interventions, and would be practical for primary care commissioning agencies to implement.

Indexed as

ExerciseAgedCommunity Health ServicesCost-Benefit AnalysisEnglandFemaleHealth PromotionHealth ServicesHealth Services for the AgedHealth Services ResearchHealth Status IndicatorsHumansMaleMortalityProgram EvaluationPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID15547060
PMCPMC1732655
OpenAlexW2100154152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.