Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15545634›Full record

ArticleGenes & development2004

A chaperone network controls the heat shock response in E. coli.

Eric Guisbert, Christophe Herman, Chi Zen Lu, Carol A Gross

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes & development, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nucleoid-associated proteins: molecular mechanisms in microbial adaptation.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eric GuisbertDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Microbiology and Immunology, and Stomatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
Christophe Herman
Chi Zen Lu
Carol A Gross
Baylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

REGULATION OF THE HEAT-SHOCK RESPONSE IN E COLIR01GM036278 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI GROSS, CAROL ANNE · 1986 to 2016
$5.2M
REGULATION OF THE HEAT SHOCK RESPONSE IN E. COLIR37GM036278 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI GROSS, CAROL ANNE · 1995 to 2004
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM32678NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM036278NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM036278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The heat shock response controls levels of chaperones and proteases to ensure a proper cellular environment for protein folding. In Escherichia coli, this response is mediated by the bacterial-specific transcription factor, sigma32. The DnaK chaperone machine regulates both the amount and activity of sigma32, thereby coupling sigma32 function to the cellular protein folding state. In this manuscript, we analyze the ability of other major chaperones in E. coli to regulate sigma32, and we demonstrate that the GroEL/S chaperonin is an additional regulator of sigma32. We show that increasing the level of GroEL/S leads to a decrease in sigma32 activity in vivo and this effect can be eliminated by co-overexpression of a GroEL/S-specific substrate. We also show that depletion of GroEL/S in vivo leads to up-regulation of sigma32 by increasing the level of sigma32. In addition, we show that changing the levels of GroEL/S during stress conditions leads to measurable changes in the heat shock response. Using purified proteins, we show that that GroEL binds to sigma32 and decreases sigma32-dependent transcription in vitro, suggesting that this regulation is direct. We discuss why using a chaperone network to regulate sigma32 results in a more sensitive and accurate detection of the protein folding environment.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialProtein FoldingTranscription, Geneticbeta-GalactosidaseChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60Escherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsHeat-Shock ProteinsHeat-Shock ResponseHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesSigma Factorbeta-GalactosidaseChaperonin 10Chaperonin 60dnaK protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsHeat-Shock Proteinsheat-shock sigma factor 32HSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesSigma Factor

Identifiers

PMID15545634
PMCPMC528900
OpenAlexW2126696746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.