ReviewMolecular and cellular biochemistry2004
Neovascularization derived from cell transplantation in ischemic myocardium.
Review in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcription factor ETV1 promotes angiogenesis after myocardial infarction via activation of the VEGFA/VEGFR2/eNOS pathway.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Dapsone Ameliorates Isoproterenol-Induced Myocardial InfarctionFrontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Effects of different doses of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilization therapy on ischemic cardiomyopathy.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Bone marrow cell recruitment mediated by inducible nitric oxide synthase/stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha signaling repairs the acoustically damaged cochlear blood-labyrinth barrier.The American journal of pathology · 2010Article
- Increased myocardial prevalence of C-reactive protein in human coronary heart disease: direct effects on microvessel density and endothelial cell survival.Cardiovascular pathology : the official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular PathologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial ischemia triggers a limited angiogenic response, part of the remodeling process that is insufficient to avoid further functional impairment. Several strategies have been evaluated to regenerate myocardial vascularization after ischemic injury such as transmyocardial laser revascularization and gene therapy. Attention has recently been focused on the potential of cell therapy to induce angiogenesis. Enhancing myocardial neovascularization is a major goal of myocardial cell transplantation because it would provide patients, who cannot undergo conventional revascularization, with an alternative therapy. Additionally, neovascularization would provide the implanted cells with adequate microenvironment to enhance survival and function. This short review gives an overview of the effect of various cell transplantation strategies on myocardial neovascularization. It suggests that in order to optimize myocardial neovascularization induced by cell therapy, future experiments should focus on the contribution of exogenous and endogenous stem cells to new vessels formation, and on the identification of the molecular pathways involved in the process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.