Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15543148›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2004

Rapid analysis of the DNA-binding specificities of transcription factors with DNA microarrays.

Sonali Mukherjee, Michael F Berger, Ghil Jona, Xun S Wang, Dale Muzzey, Michael Snyder, Richard A Young, Martha L Bulyk

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 191 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
191citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

191 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multisite λ-Dynamics for Protein-DNA Binding Affinity Prediction.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Genome-wide single-cell and single-molecule footprinting of transcription factors with deaminase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Databases and prospects of dynamic gene regulation in eukaryotes: A mini review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  20. Review

131 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sonali MukherjeeDivision of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Boston; Massachusetts 02115, USA. mlbulyk@receptor.med.harvard.edu
Michael F Berger
Ghil Jona
Xun S Wang
Dale Muzzey
Michael Snyder
Richard A Young
Martha L Bulyk

Funding

Eukaryotic Transcription Factor Binding Site LocationsR01HG002966 · NHGRI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BULYK, MARTHA L · 2003 to 2007
$1.9M
Yeast Transcription Factor Binding SpecificitiesR01HG003420 · NHGRI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BULYK, MARTHA L · 2004 to 2008
$1.8M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002966NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG003420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We developed a new DNA microarray-based technology, called protein binding microarrays (PBMs), that allows rapid, high-throughput characterization of the in vitro DNA binding-site sequence specificities of transcription factors in a single day. Using PBMs, we identified the DNA binding-site sequence specificities of the yeast transcription factors Abf1, Rap1 and Mig1. Comparison of these proteins' in vitro binding sites with their in vivo binding sites indicates that PBM-derived sequence specificities can accurately reflect in vivo DNA sequence specificities. In addition to previously identified targets, Abf1, Rap1 and Mig1 bound to 107, 90 and 75 putative new target intergenic regions, respectively, many of which were upstream of previously uncharacterized open reading frames. Comparative sequence analysis indicated that many of these newly identified sites are highly conserved across five sequenced sensu stricto yeast species and, therefore, are probably functional in vivo binding sites that may be used in a condition-specific manner. Similar PBM experiments should be useful in identifying new cis regulatory elements and transcriptional regulatory networks in various genomes.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalBase SequenceBinding SitesChromatinConserved SequenceImmunoprecipitationProtein Array AnalysisSpecies SpecificityTranscription FactorsYeastsChromatinTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID15543148
PMCPMC2692596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.