Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15542889›Full record

ReviewEndocrine2004

Hormones and bone health in postmenopausal women.

Robert Lindsay

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Biological basis of bone strength: anatomy, physiology and measurement.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. FSH Beyond Fertility.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Treatment effect ofExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Postmenopausal hormone therapy: an Endocrine Society scientific statement.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2010
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert LindsayHelen Hayes Hospital, West Haverstraw, NY, USA. lindsayr@helenhayeshosp.org
Helen Hayes Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although it has been known for some time that estrogen deficiency is a major pathogenetic factor for osteoporosis related fractures among postmenopausal women, the capability of estrogen (with or without a progestin) to prevent fractures has often been questioned. The publication of the data from the two hormone clinical trials of the Women's Health Initiative lays that discussion to rest. In both studies what have been considered a standard dose of conjugated estrogen with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate significantly reduced the risk of all fractures, including clinical vertebral fractures and hip fracture, in a population of postmenopausal women, average age 63 yr, not selected for osteoporosis by BMD. These results are particularly impressive given the difficulty of finding a fracture benefit in lower risk populations with other anti-resorptive agents. Surrogate data on lower doses of hormone therapy suggest a fracture benefit would be seen if studies were to be done. The other outcomes in WHI make it important to define appropriate clinical guidelines for use of hormone therapy for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women.

Indexed as

Estrogen Replacement TherapyPostmenopauseAgedBone and BonesBone DensityClinical Trials as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugEstrogensEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)FemaleFractures, BoneHumansMedroxyprogesterone AcetateMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalWomen's HealthEstrogensEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)Medroxyprogesterone Acetate

Identifiers

PMID15542889
OpenAlexW2055217245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.