Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15539676›Full record

ReviewBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004

The concept of essential medicines: lessons for rich countries.

Hans V Hogerzeil

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Uptake of orphan drugs in the WHO essential medicines lists.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Users' perceptions of the "My Medicine" mobile app usability.Journal of public health research · 2022
    Article
  9. Proposal for Handling of Medicine Shortages Based on a Comparison of Retrospective Risk Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pharmacoeconomics in Africa: needs, prospect and challenges.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hans V HogerzeilDrugs and Medicines Policy, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. hogerzeilh@who.int

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesDeveloping CountriesDrug CostsHealth PolicyHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacopoeias as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID15539676
PMCPMC527702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.