Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15538983›Full record

ArticleCurrent infectious disease reports2004

Antimicrobial Selection in the Treatment of Pyelonephritis.

Patricia D Brown

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current infectious disease reports, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patricia D BrownDivision of Infectious Diseases, Harper University Hospital, 5 Hudson, 3990 John R, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. pbrown@med.wayne.edu.
Harper University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pyelonephritis is a common clinical entity, although accurate data regarding the true prevalence of this infection are lacking. Acute pyelonephritis is associated with significant morbidity and even mortality. There are very few randomized controlled clinical trials that have addressed the optimal management strategies and antimicrobial therapy for this infection. Increasing resistance among uropathogens, especially Escherichia coli, has impacted recommendations for empiric antimicrobial therapy, and fluoroquinolones have emerged as the empiric therapy of choice for individuals managed as outpatients; more options are available for empiric parenteral therapy for those who require hospitalization. Further study of the epidemiology of antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens and of alternative agents for the management of pyelonephritis is urgently needed.

Identifiers

PMID15538983
OpenAlexW2068901338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.