Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15538380›Full record

ReviewThe EMBO journal2004

The E2F family: specific functions and overlapping interests.

Claire Attwooll, Eros Lazzerini Denchi, Kristian Helin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The EMBO journal, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 320 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
320citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

320 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 574 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. From Thanatos to transcription: the emerging biology of THAP proteins.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Synthetic lethality between RB-loss and E2F3 inhibition in small cell cancers targeted by pyrimidine synthesis blockade.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

260 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claire AttwoollDepartment of Experimental Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Eros Lazzerini Denchi
Kristian Helin
European Institute of Oncology · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The E2F transcription factors are key regulators of cell cycle progression and the E2F field has made rapid advances since its advent in 1986. Yet, while our understanding of the roles and functions of the E2F family has made enormous progress, with each discovery new questions arise. In this review, we summarise the most recent advances in the field and discuss the remaining key questions. In particular, we will focus on how specificity is achieved among the E2Fs.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAnimalsCell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsCell ProliferationDNA-Binding ProteinsE2F Transcription FactorsPhenotypeProtein BindingTranscription FactorsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsE2F Transcription FactorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID15538380
PMCPMC535093
OpenAlexW2104519300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.