ReviewJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2004
The role of existing and newer calcium channel blockers in the treatment of hypertension.
Review in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Calcium Channel Blockers versus Diuretics for Hypertension.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2022Pooled it
- Calcium channel blockers for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Combination therapy of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors plus calcium channel blockers versus other two-drug combinations for hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of human hypertension · 2017Pooled it
- Time course for blood pressure lowering of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- The combination of amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg produces less peripheral oedema than amlodipine 10 mg in hypertensive patients not adequately controlled with amlodipine 5 mg.International journal of clinical practice · 2009Trial
- A prospective evaluation of persistence on antihypertensive treatment with different antihypertensive drugs in clinical practice.Vascular health and risk management · 2007Trial
- Article
- The Beneficial Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonists on Blood Pressure: A Comprehensive Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Muscle afferent ASIC3 upregulation mediates the exacerbated exercise pressor reflex in male rats following hindlimb ischemia-reperfusion.Physiological reports · 2025Article
- Mechanism of heat treatment on exercise pressor reflex in hindlimb ischemia-reperfusion: Does the temperature gradient matter?Autonomic neuroscience : basic & clinical · 2025Article
- A survival case of high-dose amlodipine intoxication with non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- The Evolving Role of Calcium Channel Blockers in Hypertension Management: Pharmacological and Clinical Considerations.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Traditional Therapeutics and Potential Epidrugs for CVD: Why Not Both?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Review
- Article
- Impaired CaJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- A Novel High Content Angiogenesis Assay Reveals That Lacidipine, L-Type Calcium Channel Blocker, Induces In Vitro Vascular Lumen Expansion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- A Portable Reflective Absorbance Spectrophotometric Smartphone Device for the Rapid and Highly Accurate Determination of Amlodipine in Pharmaceutical Formulation and Human Urine Samples.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calcium channel blockers (CCBs), which include both dihydropyridines such as nifedipine and amlodipine and non-dihydropyridines (verapamil and diltiazem), are among the most widely prescribed agents for the management of essential hypertension. Several large outcome risk trials and comprehensive meta-analyses have found that CCBs reduce the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with uncontrolled hypertension, including stroke. CCBs, however, appear less effective than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics for preventing heart failure and myocardial infarction. CCBs are among the agents listed as potential first-line therapy, either alone or in combination with other agents in hypertension management guidelines. Furthermore, CCBs are suitable for add-on therapy in combination with diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin-II receptor blockers. CCBs may be partially suitable for patients with comorbid Raynaud's syndrome, isolated systolic hypertension (dihydropyridine), or angina pectoris (non-dihydropyridine). The newer inherently long-acting dihydropyridine agents (e.g., lacidipine, lercanidipine), which are not currently available in the United States, appear to have comparable efficacy to older agents of the dihydropyridine class but may have an improved tolerability profile, especially with regard to peripheral edema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.