Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15536527›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2004

Influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on histopathological and bacteriological aspects of pneumonia during low tidal volume mechanical ventilation.

Pierre Emmanuel Charles, Laurent Martin, Manuel Etienne, Delphine Croisier, Lionel Piroth, Catherine Lequeu, Jerome Pugin, Henri Portier, Pascal Chavanet

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Adrenomedullin: a vasodilator to treat sepsis?Critical care (London, England) · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pierre Emmanuel CharlesLaboratoire des Maladies Infectieuses, EA562, Dijon University Hospital, Boulevard Mal de Lattre de Tassigny, 21033 Dijon, France. pierre-emmanuel.charles@chu-dijon.fr
Laurent Martin
Manuel Etienne
Delphine Croisier
Lionel Piroth
Catherine Lequeu
Jerome Pugin
Henri Portier
Pascal Chavanet
Maison des Sciences de l’Homme de Dijon · FRUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveVentilatory strategies combining low tidal volume (V(T)) with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) are considered to be lung protective. The influence of the PEEP level was investigated on bacteriology and histology in a model of ventilator-associated pneumonia. SUBJECTS: Nineteen New Zealand rabbits.

interventionsThe animals were mechanically ventilated with a positive inspiratory pressure of 15 cmH(2)O and received either a zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP, n=6), a 5 cmH(2)O PEEP (n=5) or a 10 cmH(2)O PEEP (n=4). An inoculum of Enterobacter aerogenes was then instilled intrabronchially. The non-ventilated pneumonia group (n=4) was composed of spontaneously breathing animals which received the same inoculum. Pneumonia was assessed 24 h later. MAIN

resultsThe lung bacterial burden was higher in mechanically ventilated animals compared with spontaneously breathing animals. All animals from the latter group had negative spleen cultures. The spleen bacterial concentration was found to be lower in the 5 cmH(2)O PEEP group when compared to the ZEEP and 10 cmH(2)O PEEP groups (3.1+/-1.5 vs 4.9+/-1.1 and 5.0+/-1.3 log(10) cfu/g, respectively; p<0.05). Lung weight and histological score values were lower in the spontaneously breathing animals as well as in the 5 cmH(2)O PEEP group compared with the ZEEP and 10 cmH(2)O groups.

conclusionsMechanical ventilation substantially increased the lung bacterial burden and worsened the histological aspects of pneumonia in this rabbit model. Variations in terms of lung injury and systemic spreading of infection were noted with respect to the ventilatory strategy.

Indexed as

Positive-Pressure RespirationAnimalsEnterobacter aerogenesEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsMalePneumoniaRabbitsRespiration, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID15536527
PMCPMC7095170
OpenAlexW1996600454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.