Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15536376›Full record

ReviewRevue des maladies respiratoires2004

[Chronic cough in childhood].

M Pradal, K Retornaz, A Poisson

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revue des maladies respiratoires, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

M PradalService de Pneumologie, Hôpital Paul Desbief, Marseille, France. scp.pegliasco@wanadoo.fr
K Retornaz
A Poisson
Hôpital Nord · FRHôpital Saint Joseph · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlthough less frequent than viral induced recurrent cough; chronic cough remains a sometimes difficult to resolve diagnostic tool. STATE OF THE ART: Most authors estimate that a cough can by considered as chronic after three weeks of duration. Few papers have been published concerning etiologic diagnosis of chronic cough in childhood but these indicate the same main causes as in adults: cough variant asthma, postnasal drip syndrome, gastro-esophageal reflux. Nevertheless, each age bracket presents specific diagnosis: malformations between zero and one year, psychogenic cough in adolescents. PERSPECTIVES: New techniques as induced sputum studies helps to refine chronic cough diagnosis in childhood (after 7 years). Eosinophilic bronchitis, associated or not to bronchial hyperresponsiveness has important therapeutic consequences because associated with a favourable response to corticosteroids. Other techniques will be developed in the future (exhaled NO for example).

conclusionsChronic cough in childhood must be investigated from an anatomic point of view and on frequency arguments. Control and removal of the cough will only be obtained if a precise diagnosis and a suitable treatment are reached.

Indexed as

ChildChronic DiseaseCoughHumansRadiography, Thoracic

Identifiers

PMID15536376
PMCPMC7135783
OpenAlexW2086650747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.