ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2004
Clinical analysis of eight kindreds of familial adenomatous polyposis.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection of hMSH2 and hMLH1 mutations in Chinese hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer kindreds.World journal of gastroenterology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo study the early diagnosis and management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).
methodsEight pedigrees of FAP were collected and their pedigree trees were protracted. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of FAP patients in these kindreds were analysed.
resultsA total of 157 members were investigated in eight kindreds and 25 patients with FAP were diagnosed. The ratio of male patients and female patients was 16:9 and the average age at onset was 38 years. Among them, six patients died of cancer with a mortality rate of 28%, and 36% (9/25) FAP patients were diagnosed as synchronous colorectal cancer on the basis of FAP. A proband was diagnosed as synchronous colorectal cancer with liver metastasis and died 11 mo later after partial colectomy and hepatic metastatic lesion biopsy. The other seven probands received total abdominal colectomy and rectal mucosectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), and one of them was diagnosed as synchronous colon cancer on the basis of FAP and was still alive after 7.5 years follow-up. Among the other seven patients with synchronous colorectal cancer on the basis of FAP underwent total abdominal colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA), one underwent total remnant rectum resection and ileostomy for recurrent carcinoma in the retained rectum 2.5 years later after the IRA and was still alive, while the others all died of recurrence with a median survival time of 4.6 years. Through close follow-up and termly endoscopic surveillance, three FAP patients were detected before presenting symptoms at the age of 18, 20 and 23 years, respectively. Prophylactic IPAA was performed and results were satisfactory after the patients were followed-up for 6, 1, and 8 years, respectively.
conclusionPedigree investigation, close follow-up and termly endoscopic surveillance are very important for early detection of FAP. Prophylactic IPAA can give satisfactory results to FAP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.