Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15534222›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2004

Interacting models of cooperative gene regulation.

Debopriya Das, Nilanjana Banerjee, Michael Q Zhang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 121 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genome-wide in silico prediction of gene expression.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Comparison of targeted maximum likelihood and shrinkage estimators of parameters in gene networks.Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. ChIP-Seq of transcription factors predicts absolute and differential gene expression in embryonic stem cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Debopriya DasCold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY 11724, USA.
Nilanjana Banerjee
Michael Q Zhang
George Mason University · USCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · US

Funding

PROTEIN CODING GENES IN THE HUMAN GENOMER01HG001696 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI ZHANG, MICHAEL Q · 1997 to 2010
$5.1M
COMPUTATIONAL ANALYSIS OF GENOME EXPRESSION DATAR01GM060513 · NIGMS · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI ZHANG, MICHAEL Q · 2000 to 2002
$898k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG001696NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG001696NIGMS NIH HHS GM060513NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperativity between transcription factors is critical to gene regulation. Current computational methods do not take adequate account of this salient aspect. To address this issue, we present a computational method based on multivariate adaptive regression splines to correlate the occurrences of transcription factor binding motifs in the promoter DNA and their interactions to the logarithm of the ratio of gene expression levels. This allows us to discover both the individual motifs and synergistic pairs of motifs that are most likely to be functional, and enumerate their relative contributions at any arbitrary time point for which mRNA expression data are available. We present results of simulations and focus specifically on the yeast cell-cycle data. Inclusion of synergistic interactions can increase the prediction accuracy over linear regression to as much as 1.5- to 3.5-fold. Significant motifs and combinations of motifs are appropriately predicted at each stage of the cell cycle. We believe our multivariate adaptive regression splines-based approach will become more significant when applied to higher eukaryotes, especially mammals, where cooperative control of gene regulation is absolutely essential.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationModels, GeneticCell CycleDatabases, GeneticDNA, FungalGene Expression Regulation, FungalModels, StatisticalMultivariate AnalysisPromoter Regions, GeneticRNA, FungalRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription FactorsDNA, FungalRNA, FungalRNA, MessengerSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID15534222
PMCPMC528978
OpenAlexW2070340804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.