Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15534219›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2004

A versatile statistical analysis algorithm to detect genome copy number variation.

Raoul-Sam Daruwala, Archisman Rudra, Harry Ostrer, Robert Lucito, Michael Wigler, Bud Mishra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. On the frequency of copy number variants.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2008
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Getting started in tiling microarray analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2007
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Raoul-Sam DaruwalaCourant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, 251 Mercer Street, New York, NY 10012, USA.
Archisman Rudra
Harry Ostrer
Robert Lucito
Michael Wigler
Bud Mishra

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a versatile statistical analysis algorithm for the detection of genomic aberrations in human cancer cell lines. The algorithm analyzes genomic data obtained from a variety of array technologies, such as oligonucleotide array, bacterial artificial chromosome array, or array-based comparative genomic hybridization, that operate by hybridizing with genomic material obtained from cancer and normal cells and allow detection of regions of the genome with altered copy number. The number of probes (i.e., resolution), the amount of uncharacterized noise per probe, and the severity of chromosomal aberrations per chromosomal region may vary with the underlying technology, biological sample, and sample preparation. Constrained by these uncertainties, our algorithm aims at robustness by using a priorless maximum a posteriori estimator and at efficiency by a dynamic programming implementation. We illustrate these characteristics of our algorithm by applying it to data obtained from representational oligonucleotide microarray analysis and array-based comparative genomic hybridization technology as well as to synthetic data obtained from an artificial model whose properties can be varied computationally. The algorithm can combine data from multiple sources and thus facilitate the discovery of genes and markers important in cancer, as well as the discovery of loci important in inherited genetic disease.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene DosageBayes TheoremBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorChromosome AberrationsData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleGenome, HumanHumansMaleNucleic Acid HybridizationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID15534219
PMCPMC528962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.