Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15533256›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2004

A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect on response of including a lottery incentive in health surveys [ISRCTN32203485].

L M Roberts, S Wilson, A Roalfe, P Bridge

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

L M RobertsDept. Primary Care and General Practice, Division of Primary Care, Public and Occupational Health, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. l.m.roberts@bham.ac.uk <l.m.roberts@bham.ac.uk>
S Wilson
A Roalfe
P Bridge

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostal questionnaires are an economical and simple method of data collection for research purposes but are subject to non-response bias. Several studies have explored the effect of monetary and non-monetary incentives on response. Recent meta-analyses conclude that financial incentives are an effective way of increasing response rates. However, large surveys rarely have the resources to reward individual participants. Three previous papers report on the effectiveness of lottery incentives with contradictory results. This study aimed to determine the effect of including a lottery-style incentive on response rates to a postal health survey.

methodsRandomised controlled trial.

settingNorth and West Birmingham. 8,645 patients aged 18 or over randomly selected from registers of eight general practices (family physician practices).

interventionInclusion of a flyer and letter with a health questionnaire informing patients that returned questionnaires would be entered into a lottery-style draw for pound 100 of gift vouchers. CONTROL: Health questionnaire accompanied only by standard letter of explanation.

main outcome measuresResponse rate and completion rate to questionnaire.

results5,209 individuals responded with identical rates in both groups (62.1%). Practice, patient age, sex and Townsend score (a postcode based deprivation measure) were identified as predictive of response, with higher response related to older age, being female and living in an area with a lower Townsend score (less deprived).

conclusionThis RCT, using a large community based sample, found that the offer of entry into a lottery style draw for pound 100 of High Street vouchers has no effect on response rates to a postal health questionnaire.

Indexed as

Correspondence as TopicHealth SurveysMotivationPatient SelectionRewardAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEnglandFamily PracticeFemaleGamblingHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID15533256
PMCPMC534094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.