Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15530014›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2004

Urovirulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: planktonic cells vs. biofilm cells.

V Yadav, K Harjai, R Kaur, K Joshi, S Sharma

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

V YadavDepartment of Microbiology, Panjab University, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
K Harjai
R Kaur
K Joshi
S Sharma
Panjab University · INInstitute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Planktonic and biofilm cells of a clinical urinary isolate of P. aeruginosa were compared in vitro for their ability to adhere to uroepithelial cells, interaction with macrophages, and for production of virulence factors like extracellular proteinase, elastase, hemolysin, phospholipase C and pyochelin. Biofilm cells showed increased adherence to UECs, which was coupled with reduced uptake and intracellular killing by macrophages. Overall there was a decrease in production of extracellular products by biofilm cells. Comparing the two cell forms for their ability to establish infection in an ascending model of acute pyelonephritis, significant enhancement of renal bacterial load, as well as more pronounced renal pathology developed with biofilm cells.

Indexed as

BiofilmsAnimalsFemaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPlanktonPseudomonas aeruginosaPyelonephritisVirulence

Identifiers

PMID15530014
OpenAlexW1968952333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.