Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15529165›Full record

ReviewNature biotechnology2004

Recombinant protein folding and misfolding in Escherichia coli.

François Baneyx, Mirna Mujacic

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature biotechnology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 476 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
476citing papers in PubMed
51.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

476 citing papers in PubMed, 1,436 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Engineering of a Carbonic Anhydrase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  8. Production of isotope-labeled nanobody KN035 inMagnetic resonance letters · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Achieving protease substrate-specific inhibition by mAb dual functional selections.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

416 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

François BaneyxDepartments of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering, University of Washington, Box 351750, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA. baneyx@u.washington.edu
Mirna Mujacic
Seattle University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past 20 years have seen enormous progress in the understanding of the mechanisms used by the enteric bacterium Escherichia coli to promote protein folding, support protein translocation and handle protein misfolding. Insights from these studies have been exploited to tackle the problems of inclusion body formation, proteolytic degradation and disulfide bond generation that have long impeded the production of complex heterologous proteins in a properly folded and biologically active form. The application of this information to industrial processes, together with emerging strategies for creating designer folding modulators and performing glycosylation all but guarantee that E. coli will remain an important host for the production of both commodity and high value added proteins.

Indexed as

Protein FoldingEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialInclusion BodiesProtein EngineeringProtein TransportRecombinant ProteinsSignal TransductionEscherichia coli ProteinsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15529165
OpenAlexW1970756887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.