Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15528738›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004

Evaluation of a modified gen-probe amplified direct test for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex organisms in cerebrospinal fluid.

Joann L Cloud, Cheryl Shutt, Wade Aldous, Gail Woods

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joann L CloudARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA. cloudjl@aruplab.com
Cheryl Shutt
Wade Aldous
Gail Woods

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laboratory evidence for tuberculous meningitis is difficult to acquire due to the low numbers of organisms present in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the presence of nucleic acid amplification inhibitors. The Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Test (MTD) is sensitive and specific for the direct detection of M. tuberculosis complex in respiratory samples but has not been approved for CSF. We evaluated a modified version of the current MTD, optimized for use with CSF samples. Samples were prepared by spiking CSF with various numbers of M. tuberculosis complex organisms. The modified MTD performance was compared with results obtained using a purified RNA sample extracted using the Qiagen RNeasy Protect Bacteria Mini Kit. By use of CSF artificially spiked with M. tuberculosis complex, the sensitivity of the modified MTD was 100% (six of six) for CSF samples containing approximately 600 CFU/ml, 78% (seven of nine) for approximately 60 CFU/ml, 50% (three of six) for 6 CFU/ml, and 17% (one of six) for samples with <1 CFU/ml. The specificity of the modified MTD method was 100% (22 of 22). The sensitivity of the Qiagen MTD method was 100% for CSF samples containing approximately 600 CFU/ml (six of six) and approximately 60 CFU/ml (nine of nine), 50% for samples with approximately 6 CFU/ml (three of six), and 50% for samples with <1 CFU/ml (three of six). The specificity of the Qiagen MTD method was 86% (19 of 22). With the Qiagen MTD method, however, initial results were equivocal for 14 of the 27 (52%) positive samples, requiring repeat analysis, whereas with the modified MTD, only 1 of 27 (4%) was equivocal. The modified MTD for CSF samples was less time-consuming and less expensive and resulted in considerably fewer equivocal results than the Qiagen MTD method did.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticCerebrospinal FluidColony Count, MicrobialHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesRNA, BacterialSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosis, MeningealReagent Kits, DiagnosticRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID15528738
PMCPMC525225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.