ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2004
Evaluation of the etest method using Mueller-Hinton agar with glucose and methylene blue for determining amphotericin B MICs for 4,936 clinical isolates of Candida species.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mixed oral candidiasis in type 2 diabetic patients: Identification and spectrum of sensitivityBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2023Article
- Relative Abundances of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata inApplied and environmental microbiology · 2018Article
- Detection of amphotericin B resistance in Candida haemulonii and closely related species by use of the Etest, Vitek-2 yeast susceptibility system, and CLSI and EUCAST broth microdilution methods.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2012Article
- Caspofungin Etest endpoint for Aspergillus isolates shows poor agreement with the reference minimum effective concentration.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2010Article
- Canadian clinical practice guidelines for invasive candidiasis in adults.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2010Article
- Mutants with heteroresistance to amphotericin B and fluconazole in Candida.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2009Article
- Candida krusei, a multidrug-resistant opportunistic fungal pathogen: geographic and temporal trends from the ARTEMIS DISK Antifungal Surveillance Program, 2001 to 2005.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2008Article
- Multicenter comparison of the VITEK 2 antifungal susceptibility test with the CLSI broth microdilution reference method for testing amphotericin B, flucytosine, and voriconazole against Candida spp.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2007Article
- Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2007Review
- Slow response of invasive Candida krusei infection to amphotericin B in a clinical time-kill study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2006Article
- Use of Mueller-Hinton broth and agar in the germ tube test.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao PauloArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The performance of the Etest using Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with glucose (2%) and methylene blue (0.5 microg/ml) (MH-GMB) for amphotericin B susceptibility testing of 4,936 isolates of Candida spp. was assessed against that of Etest using RPMI agar with 2% glucose (RPG). MICs were determined by Etest in both media for all 4,936 isolates and were read after incubation for 48 h at 35 degrees C. The Candida isolates included C. albicans (n = 2,728), C. glabrata (n = 722), C. parapsilosis (n = 666), C. tropicalis (n = 528), C. krusei (n = 143), C. lusitaniae (n = 54), C. guilliermondii (n = 39), C. pelliculosa (n = 17), C. kefyr (n = 15), C. rugosa (n = 11), C. dubliniensis (n = 5), C. zeylanoides (n = 4), C. lipolytica (n = 3), and C. famata (n = 1). The Etest results with MH-GMB correlated well with those with RPG. Overall agreement was 92.9%, and agreements for individual species were as follows: C. lusitaniae, 98.1%; C. albicans, 95.1%; C. glabrata, 94.3%; C. krusei, 91.6%; C. parapsilosis, 86.6%; and C. tropicalis, 86.4%. The Etest method using MH-GMB appears to be a useful method for determining amphotericin B susceptibilities of Candida species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.