Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15528570›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2004

Verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli in wild birds and rodents in close proximity to farms.

Eva Møller Nielsen, Marianne N Skov, Jesper J Madsen, Jens Lodal, Jørgen Brøchner Jespersen, Dorte L Baggesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Are we overestimating risk of enteric pathogen spillover from wild birds to humans?Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Analysis of the genetic and phylogenetic context ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Pathogenicity assessment of Shiga toxin-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. European Starlings (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Recent Updates on Outbreaks of Shiga Toxin-ProducingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eva Møller NielsenDanish Institute for Food and Veterinary Research, Copenhagen, Denmark. emn@ssi.dk
Marianne N Skov
Jesper J Madsen
Jens Lodal
Jørgen Brøchner Jespersen
Dorte L Baggesen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild animals living close to cattle and pig farms (four each) were examined for verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli (VTEC; also known as Shiga toxin-producing E. coli). The prevalence of VTEC among the 260 samples from wild animals was generally low. However, VTEC isolates from a starling (Sturnus vulgaris) and a Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus) were identical to cattle isolates from the corresponding farms with respect to serotype, virulence profile, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type. This study shows that wild birds and rodents may become infected from farm animals or vice versa, suggesting a possible role in VTEC transmission.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsAnimals, WildBirdsCattleEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsRatsShiga ToxinsStarlingsSwineShiga Toxins

Identifiers

PMID15528570
PMCPMC525191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.