Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15527686›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2004

Energy substrate metabolism in cardiac hypertrophy.

Michael F Allard

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. In vivo [U-American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Complex role of the HIF system in cardiovascular biology.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2010
    Review
  19. Substrate uptake and metabolism are preserved in hypertrophic caveolin-3 knockout hearts.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2008
    Article
  20. Protection of the abnormal heart.Heart failure reviews · 2007
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael F AllardThe James Hogg iCapture Centre for Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Research, Room 166, St. Pauls Hospital, 1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada. mallard@mrl.ubc.ca
St. Paul's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac hypertrophy is a response to long-term pathologic (eg, hypertension) or physiologic (eg, exercise) hemodynamic overload accompanied by changes in energy substrate utilization. The pattern of substrate utilization (or metabolic phenotype) differs dramatically between pathologic and physiologic cardiac hypertrophy with directionally opposite changes in oxidation of fatty acids and glucose and glycolysis. These findings indicate that the metabolic response to long-term alterations in hemodynamic workload is not stereotypical, but is influenced by the nature of the stimulus leading to cardiac hypertrophy. Although the changes in substrate utilization are adaptive, in the case of pathologic stimuli, the changes in metabolism interfere with functional resiliency of the heart to metabolic stress, as occurs during ischemia-reperfusion. The distinct metabolic phenotypes of hearts hypertrophied in response to pathologic or physiologic stimuli are due not only to alteration in expression of metabolic enzymes and proteins, but also to post-translational modulation of metabolic enzymes and proteins.

Indexed as

CardiomegalyEnergy MetabolismHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID15527686
OpenAlexW1975981060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.