Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15527507›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2004

An enigmatic fourth runt domain gene in the fugu genome: ancestral gene loss versus accelerated evolution.

Gustavo Glusman, Amardeep Kaur, Leroy Hood, Lee Rowen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The evolution of vertebrate Toll-like receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2005
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gustavo GlusmanInstitute for Systems Biology, 1441 N 34th St,, Seattle, WA 98103, USA. cgojp@systemsbiology.org
Amardeep Kaur
Leroy Hood
Lee Rowen
Institute for Systems Biology · USSeattle University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe runt domain transcription factors are key regulators of developmental processes in bilaterians, involved both in cell proliferation and differentiation, and their disruption usually leads to disease. Three runt domain genes have been described in each vertebrate genome (the RUNX gene family), but only one in other chordates. Therefore, the common ancestor of vertebrates has been thought to have had a single runt domain gene.

resultsAnalysis of the genome draft of the fugu pufferfish (Takifugu rubripes) reveals the existence of a fourth runt domain gene, FrRUNT, in addition to the orthologs of human RUNX1, RUNX2 and RUNX3. The tiny FrRUNT packs six exons and two putative promoters in just 3 kb of genomic sequence. The first exon is located within an intron of FrSUPT3H, the ortholog of human SUPT3H, and the first exon of FrSUPT3H resides within the first intron of FrRUNT. The two gene structures are therefore "interlocked". In the human genome, SUPT3H is instead interlocked with RUNX2. FrRUNT has no detectable ortholog in the genomes of mammals, birds or amphibians. We consider alternative explanations for an apparent contradiction between the phylogenetic data and the comparison of the genomic neighborhoods of human and fugu runt domain genes. We hypothesize that an ancient RUNT locus was lost in the tetrapod lineage, together with FrFSTL6, a member of a novel family of follistatin-like genes.

conclusionsOur results suggest that the runt domain family may have started expanding in chordates much earlier than previously thought, and exemplify the importance of detailed analysis of whole-genome draft sequence to provide new insights into gene evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DeletionGenomeAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitCore Binding Factor Alpha 3 SubunitCore Binding Factor alpha SubunitsDNA-Binding ProteinsFollistatinHumansMolecular Sequence DataNeoplasm ProteinsPeptidesCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitCore Binding Factor Alpha 2 SubunitCore Binding Factor Alpha 3 SubunitCore Binding Factor alpha SubunitsDNA-Binding ProteinsFollistatinNeoplasm ProteinsPeptidesProto-Oncogene ProteinsRUNX1 protein, humanRunx3 protein, humanSUPT3H protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID15527507
PMCPMC533870
OpenAlexW1576750262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.