ReviewJournal of neuro-oncology
The changing role of stereotaxis in surgical neuro-oncology.
Review in Journal of neuro-oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiplanar MRI-CT fusion neuronavigation-guided serial stereotactic biopsy of human brain tumors: proof of a strong correlation between tumor imaging and histopathology by a new technical approach.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2009Trial
- Stereoelectroencephalography: Indication and Efficacy.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2017Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEvaluate evolution and time course of stereotactic neurosurgery within surgical neuro-oncology.
methodsMEDLINE search 1966-2003 sub-stratified and analyzed for annual trends. AANS/CNS membership databases for Joint Sections. ACRC neuro-oncology program database 1998-2003.
resultsTumor stereotaxis emerged in 1980 and became the dominant stereotactic publication topic by 1984. Frame-based tumor stereotaxis led publications through 1994, when supplanted by stereotactic radiosurgery (SR). Brachytherapy led SR 1982-1987, but then fell behind, reducing to pre-1983 levels by 1996. SR publications currently comprise 65% of stereotactic tumor articles and publication rate continues to rise at a steady rate. Frameless stereotaxis (FS) publications began to increase in 1993 and growth is larger than the corresponding fall in frame-based volumetric resection publications. Data suggest increased utilization for cases that would have otherwise utilized ultrasound or gone without image guidance. Intraoperative MR developed predominantly as complimentary technology to FS. Tumor diagnostic needle biopsy publications continue to be mostly frame-based, while FS techniques are largely resection focused. This may change as >80% of our tumors biopsied with frame-based techniques would be candidates for FS biopsy based solely on lesion size, location, and technique accuracy considerations. CNS parenchymal delivery of experimental therapies continues to be predominantly frame-based.
conclusionThe role of tumor stereotaxis in surgical neuro-oncology is important, but changing. SR is increasingly dominating the subspecialty. Stereotactic tumor resection has become a mainstream neurosurgical procedure due to FS, and this will likely occur with needle biopsy as well. Delivery of experimental therapies remains predominantly frame-based, but may need to transition to FS in order to gain wider mainstream acceptance and applicability once efficacy is demonstrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.