Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15526218›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics2005

Non-recurrent 17p11.2 deletions are generated by homologous and non-homologous mechanisms.

Christine J Shaw, James R Lupski

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Novel and Recurrent Copy Number Variants inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frequency of DNA end joiningProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multi-Invasion-Induced Rearrangements as a Pathway for Physiological and Pathological Recombination.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Decoding NF1 Intragenic Copy-Number Variations.American journal of human genetics · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christine J ShawDepartment of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Room 604B, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
James R Lupski
Baylor College of Medicine · USTexas Children's Hospital · US

Funding

UNDERSTANDING FXTAS AMONG MALES WITH THE FMR1 PREMUTATIONP30HD024064 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI ZOGHBI, HUDA Y · 1988 to 2013
$29.4M
Telomere integrity of de novo terminal deletionsP01HD039420 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LUPSKI, JAMES R. · 2001 to 2005
$4.7M
NICHD NIH HHS HD24064NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD39420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several recurrent common chromosomal deletion and duplication breakpoints have been localized to large, highly homologous, low-copy repeats (LCRs). The mechanism responsible for these rearrangements, viz., non-allelic homologous recombination between LCR copies, has been well established. However, fewer studies have examined the mechanisms responsible for non-recurrent rearrangements with non-homologous breakpoint regions. Here, we have analyzed four uncommon deletions of 17p11.2, involving the Smith-Magenis syndrome region. Using somatic cell hybrid lines created from patient lymphoblasts, we have utilized a strategy based on the polymerase chain reaction to refine the deletion breakpoints and to obtain sequence data at the deletion junction. Our analyses have revealed that two of the four deletions are a product of Alu/Alu recombination, whereas the remaining two deletions result from a non-homologous end-joining mechanism. Of the breakpoints studied, three of eight are located in LCRs, and five of eight are within repetitive elements, including Alu and MER5B sequences. These findings suggest that higher-order genomic architecture, such as LCRs, and smaller repetitive sequences, such as Alu elements, can mediate chromosomal deletions via homologous and non-homologous mechanisms. These data further implicate homologous recombination as the predominant mechanism of deletion formation in this genomic interval.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17Recombination, GeneticSequence DeletionBase SequenceHumansMolecular Sequence DataSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID15526218
OpenAlexW1997012973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.