Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15526159›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2004

Immortalization protocols used in cell culture models of human breast morphogenesis.

T Gudjonsson, R Villadsen, L Rønnov-Jessen, O W Petersen

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development of a NovelFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Association of Notch1 with vasculogenic mimicry in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

T GudjonssonMolecular and Cell Biology Research Laboratory, Icelandic Cancer Society, P.O. Box 5420, 125, Reykjavik, Iceland. thorarinn@krabb.is
R Villadsen
L Rønnov-Jessen
O W Petersen
Icelandic Cancer Society · IS

Funding

Definition of the Microenvironment in Breast CancerR01CA064786 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI BISSELL, MINA · 1995 to 2020
$6.1M
Definition of Microenvironment in Breast CancerR37CA064786 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI BISSELL, MINA · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS CA-64786-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defining the key players in normal breast differentiation is instrumental to understanding how morphogenesis becomes defective during breast cancer progression. During the past 2 decades much effort has been devoted to the development of technologies for purification and expansion of primary human breast cells in culture and optimizing a relevant microenvironment, which may help to define the niche that regulates breast differentiation and morphogenesis. In contrast to the general property of cancer, normal human cells have a finite lifespan. After a defined number of population doublings, normal cells enter an irreversible proliferation-arrested state referred to as replicative senescence. To overcome this obstacle for continuous long-term studies, replicative senescence can be bypassed by treatment of cells with chemical agents such as benzopyrene, by radiation or by transfection with viral oncogenes or the gene for human telomerase (human telomerase reverse transcriptase, hTERT). A drawback of some of these protocols is a concurrent introduction of chromosomal changes, which sometimes leads to a transformed phenotype and selection of a subpopulation, which may not be representative of the tissue of origin. In recent years, we have sought to establish immortalized primary breast cells, which retain crucial characteristics of their original in situ tissue pattern. This review discusses various approaches to immortalization of breast-derived epithelial and stromal cells and the application of such cell lines for studies on human breast morphogenesis.

Indexed as

BreastCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell LineCell ProliferationCell Transformation, NeoplasticCellular SenescenceDNA-Binding ProteinsHumansNeoplasmsOncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus E7 ProteinsRepressor ProteinsTelomeraseDNA-Binding ProteinsE6 protein, Human papillomavirus type 16oncogene protein E7, Human papillomavirus type 16Oncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus E7 ProteinsRepressor ProteinsTelomerase

Identifiers

PMID15526159
PMCPMC11924520
OpenAlexW1985047715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.