Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15526058›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2004

A randomised, double-blind, controlled vaccine efficacy trial of DNA/MVA ME-TRAP against malaria infection in Gambian adults.

Vasee S Moorthy, Egeruan B Imoukhuede, Paul Milligan, Kalifa Bojang, Sheila Keating, Pauline Kaye, Margaret Pinder, Sarah C Gilbert, Gijs Walraven, Brian M Greenwood and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02485912 (A Phase Ib Safety and Immunogenicity Clinical Trial of Heterologous Prime-boost Immunisation With ChAd3-EBO Z and MVA-EBO Z in Healthy Senegalese Adult Volunteers Aged 18-50 Years.), which is not on this map. Cited by 63 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02485912 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

A Phase Ib Safety and Immunogenicity Clinical Trial of Heterologous Prime-boost Immunisation With ChAd3-EBO Z and MVA-EBO Z in Healthy Senegalese Adult Volunteers Aged 18-50 Years.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2015 to 2016Enrolled40ConditionsEbola Virus DiseaseArmsChAd3-EBO Z, MVA-EBO Z
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Vaccines for preventing malaria (pre-erythrocytic).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. ProteinFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vasee S MoorthyMedical Research Council Laboratories, Banjul, Gambia. vmoorthy@malariavaccine.org
Egeruan B Imoukhuede
Paul Milligan
Kalifa Bojang
Sheila Keating
Pauline Kaye
Margaret Pinder
Sarah C Gilbert
Gijs Walraven
Brian M Greenwood
Adrian S V Hill

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany malaria vaccines are currently in development, although very few have been evaluated for efficacy in the field. Plasmodium falciparum multiple epitope (ME)- thrombospondin-related adhesion protein (TRAP) candidate vaccines are designed to potently induce effector T cells and so are a departure from earlier malaria vaccines evaluated in the field in terms of their mechanism of action. ME-TRAP vaccines encode a polyepitope string and the TRAP sporozoite antigen. Two vaccine vectors encoding ME-TRAP, plasmid DNA and modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA), when used sequentially in a prime-boost immunisation regime, induce high frequencies of effector T cells and partial protection, manifest as delay in time to parasitaemia, in a clinical challenge model. METHODS AND

findingsA total of 372 Gambian men aged 15-45 y were randomised to receive either DNA ME-TRAP followed by MVA ME-TRAP or rabies vaccine (control). Of these men, 296 received three doses of vaccine timed to coincide with the beginning of the transmission season (141 in the DNA/MVA group and 155 in the rabies group) and were followed up. Volunteers were given sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine 2 wk before the final vaccination. Blood smears were collected weekly for 11 wk and whenever a volunteer developed symptoms compatible with malaria during the transmission season. The primary endpoint was time to first infection with asexual P. falciparum. Analysis was per protocol. DNA ME-TRAP and MVA ME-TRAP were safe and well-tolerated. Effector T cell responses to a non-vaccine strain of TRAP were 50-fold higher postvaccination in the malaria vaccine group than in the rabies vaccine group. Vaccine efficacy, adjusted for confounding factors, was 10.3% (95% confidence interval, -22% to +34%; p = 0.49). Incidence of malaria infection decreased with increasing age and was associated with ethnicity.

conclusionsDNA/MVA heterologous prime-boost vaccination is safe and highly immunogenic for effector T cell induction in a malaria-endemic area. But despite having produced a substantial reduction in liver-stage parasites in challenge studies of non-immune volunteers, this first generation T cell-inducing vaccine was ineffective at reducing the natural infection rate in semi-immune African adults.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultDouble-Blind MethodEpitopesGambiaHumansImmunity, InnateMalaria, FalciparumMalaria VaccinesMaleMiddle AgedProtozoan ProteinsT-LymphocytesVaccinationEpitopesMalaria VaccinesProtozoan Proteinsthrombospondin-related adhesive protein, protozoan

Identifiers

PMID15526058
PMCPMC524376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.