Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15525672›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2005

Analysis of a spindle pole body mutant reveals a defect in biorientation and illuminates spindle forces.

Tennessee J Yoder, Mark A McElwain, Susan E Francis, Joy Bagley, Eric G D Muller, Brian Pak, Eileen T O'Toole, Mark Winey, Trisha N Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tennessee J YoderDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Mark A McElwain
Susan E Francis
Joy Bagley
Eric G D Muller
Brian Pak
Eileen T O'Toole
Mark Winey
Trisha N Davis

Funding

ZDS2P REGULATES SWE1P-DEPENDENT POLARIZED CELL GROWTH IN S CEREVISIAEP41RR011823 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, TRACY · 1996 to 2011
$24.7M
WORKSHOPS AND TRAINING FOR IMAGE ANALYSIS USING IMODP41RR000592 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI BASS, PETER W. · 1985 to 2011
$11.9M
MOLECULAR ANALYSIS OF THE SPINDLE POLE BODYR01GM040506 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, TRISHA N. · 1988 to 2018
$8.6M
Role of MPSI Kinase and Yeast Spindle Pole CycleR01GM051312 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI WINEY, MARK · 1994 to 2015
$5.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR000592NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR011823NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR11823NCRR NIH HHS RR-00592NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM040506NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM051312NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM40506NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM51312
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spindle pole body (SPB) is the microtubule organizing center in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. An essential task of the SPB is to ensure assembly of the bipolar spindle, which requires a proper balancing of forces on the microtubules and chromosomes. The SPB component Spc110p connects the ends of the spindle microtubules to the core of the SPB. We previously reported the isolation of a mutant allele spc110-226 that causes broken spindles and SPB disintegration 30 min after spindle formation. By live cell imaging of mutant cells with green fluorescent protein (GFP)-Tub1p or Spc97p-GFP, we show that spc110-226 mutant cells have early defects in spindle assembly. Short spindles form but do not advance to the 1.5-microm stage and frequently collapse. Kinetochores are not arranged properly in the mutant cells. In 70% of the cells, no stable biorientation occurs and all kinetochores are associated with only one SPB. Examination of the SPB remnants by electron microscopy tomography and fluorescence microscopy revealed that the Spc110-226p/calmodulin complex is stripped off of the central plaque of the SPB and coalesces to from a nucleating structure in the nucleoplasm. The central plaque components Spc42p and Spc29p remain behind in the nuclear envelope. The delamination is likely due to a perturbed interaction between Spc42p and Spc110-226p as detected by fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis. We suggest that the force exerted on the SPB by biorientation of the chromosomes pulls the Spc110-226p out of the SPB; removal of force exerted by coherence of the sister chromatids reduced fragmentation fourfold. Removal of the forces exerted by the cytoplasmic microtubules had no effect on fragmentation. Our results provide insights into the relative contributions of the kinetochore and cytoplasmic microtubules to the forces involved in formation of a bipolar spindle.

Indexed as

Spindle ApparatusAllelesBlotting, WesternCalmodulin-Binding ProteinsCell NucleusCell SeparationChromosomesCytoplasmCytoskeletal ProteinsDNADNA FragmentationFlow CytometryFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferGenotypeGreen Fluorescent ProteinsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedCalmodulin-Binding ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsDNAGreen Fluorescent ProteinsNuclear ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSPC110 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID15525672
PMCPMC539159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.