ReviewPharmacoEconomics2004
Clinical and economic impact of epoetins in cancer care.
Review in PharmacoEconomics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Management of anaemia: a critical and systematic review of the cost effectiveness of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.PharmacoEconomics · 2008Pooled it
- Economic burden of haematological adverse effects in cancer patients: a systematic review.Clinical drug investigation · 2007Pooled it
- Dose reduction of epoetin-alpha in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced anaemia.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2010Trial
- Costs of care for lung and colon cancer patients receiving chemotherapy following FDA policy changes.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014Article
- Recombinant erythropoietin for chemotherapy-related anaemia: economic value and health-related quality-of-life assessment using direct utility elicitation and discrete choice experiment methods.PharmacoEconomics · 2007Article
- Clinical and economic impact of epoetin in adjuvant-chemotherapy for breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedDosage error in article text
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anaemia develops in most patients undergoing cancer therapy and invariably induces fatigue, which is a major determinant of QOL. Blood transfusions are reserved for patients with severe anaemia, since blood is a scarce resource and provides a short-lived benefit. Epoetins are recombinant proteins capable of alleviating therapy-related anaemia in 40-60% of cancer patients. The number of patients needed to be treated with epoetins to avoid the transfusion of one unit of blood ranges from 2.6 to 5.2; however, the absolute risk reduction depends on patients' characteristics and dose-escalation. The ratio between acquisition costs of epoetins and blood transfusion requirement is very high; thus, many thousands of dollars needs to be spent on epoetins to save 1 blood unit. Despite this, epoetins have been widely adopted by industrialised countries, where cancer patients are about 2% of the total population. The resulting budget impact of epoetins can be calculated at about 10% of the overall direct cost for cancer care, and it is expected to continue growing by about 20% each year, due to the expanding cancer population and the intensification of cancer therapies. The economic burden of epoetins needs to be weighed against the improvement of patients' QOL and society's willingness to pay for a non-life-saving therapy. All published economic evaluations of epoetins invariably report that this supportive therapy is not cost effective. Society should be made aware of the opportunity cost of treatments and should be allowed to elicit preferences for healthcare interventions and prioritisation criteria. In the near future we expect that a wider range of epoetins, drug patent expiry, a more appropriate patient selection criteria and an improved dosage schedule may help increase the efficiency of cancer-related anaemia management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.