ReviewMedGenMed : Medscape general medicine2004
Anticoagulation therapy for venous thromboembolism.
Review in MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of Cochrane anticoagulation reviews.Medscape journal of medicine · 2009Pooled it
- Back to the Basics: Inferior Vena Cava Filters.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2022Review
- Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline compliance: a pilot study of augmented medication charts.Irish journal of medical science · 2015Article
- Warfarin prescription and administration: reducing the delay, improving the safety.BMJ quality improvement reports · 2015Article
- Deep Vein Thrombosis in Elderly Patients following Surgery for Fracture of the Proximal Femur.Malaysian orthopaedic journal · 2014Article
- Diet as prophylaxis and treatment for venous thromboembolism?Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2010Review
- Evidence-based medicine and the Cochrane Collaboration on trial.MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine · 2007Article
- Extensive arterial and venous thrombosis in a patient with ulcerative colitis--a case report.MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine · 2005Article
- Readers' responses to the article entitled "anticoagulation therapy for venous thromboembolism".MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine · 2005Article
- Is the current standard of medical practice for treating venous thromboembolism simply wrong?MedGenMed : Medscape general medicine · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextOn the basis of theoretical rationale, heparoids and vitamin K antagonists are prescribed to prevent complications of venous thromboembolism (VTE, including pulmonary emboli [PE] and deep vein thrombosis [DVT]). They have been employed as the standard of care for treatment of VTE for over 40 years.
objectiveCritique the evidence supporting the efficacy of anticoagulants for the treatment of VTE in reducing morbidity and/or mortality. DATA SOURCES: This includes a search of reference lists and Medline. STUDY SELECTION: This includes studies concerning the diagnosis and incidence of PE and DVT, efficacy of anticoagulants in preventing complications, risks of anticoagulant therapy, and the costs of diagnosis and the treatment of VTE. DATA EXTRACTION: I analyzed references cited in reviews and meta-analyses of VTE, and from Medline searches concerning diagnosis and treatment. The data quality and validity of studies depended on the consistency of findings and statistical significance of the data. DATA SYNTHESIS: No placebo-controlled trials of anticoagulants as treatment of PE with objective criteria for diagnosis have been published. Three randomized trials of anticoagulants vs no anticoagulants in DVT showed no benefit with heparin and vitamin K antagonists (combined all-cause mortality: anticoagulants = 6/66, un-anticoagulated controls = 1/60, P = .07). No placebo-controlled trials of low-molecular-weight heparins or thrombolytic drugs have been done; therefore, their efficacy in VTE depends entirely on randomized comparisons with unfractionated heparin. They have not been proven safer or more efficacious than unfractionated heparin. Thrombolysis causes more major and fatal bleeds than heparin and is no more effective in preventing PE. Diagnosing and treating VTE patients in the United States with anticoagulants costs 3.2 dollars to 15.5 billion dollars per year (1992 dollars). Bleeding and complications of angiography cause 1017-3525 deaths annually.
conclusionAnticoagulants have not been proven efficacious or safe in VTE. The bleeding risks and other complications of anticoagulation are unacceptably high. The use of anticoagulants for patients with VTE should be reconsidered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15520627PMC1435637W48289862What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.