ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2004
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a general intensive care unit.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Timing and clinical risk factors for early acquisition of gut pathogen colonization with multidrug resistant organisms in the intensive care unit.Gut pathogens · 2024Article
- Bacterial Co-Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance in Patients Hospitalized with Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19 Pneumonia in Kazakhstan.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Evaluation of bacterial co-infections of the respiratory tract in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Typing of staphylococcal cassette chromosomeNew microbes and new infections · 2018Article
- Clinical characteristics, virulence factors and molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in Shenzhen City, China.Epidemiology and infection · 2016Article
- Article
- Screening, isolation, and decolonisation strategies in the control of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units: cost effectiveness evaluation.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2011Article
- MRSA prevalence in European healthcare settings: a review.BMC infectious diseases · 2011Review
- Population structure of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from intensive care unit patients in the netherlands over an 11-year period (1996 to 2006).Journal of clinical microbiology · 2009Article
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2005Article
- MRSA--past, present, future.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2004Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has presented special problems in intensive care units (ICUs) because of the difficulties in implementing infection control measures. The prevalence and rate of acquisition of MRSA were studied over thirty months in a nine-bed ICU. Nasal and groin swabs were taken on admission and then weekly, and other cultures as clinically indicated. Of 1361 admissions 119 were MRSA-positive on arrival. 21 cases had been identified before admission and the remainder were detected by screening; in 57 the positive result was known only after discharge. Of the 1242 admissions initially negative 68 acquired MRSA while in the ICU. The ICU had no known MRSA-positive patients on 185 (20.3%) of 914 days, the longest sequence being 17 days. Positive patients occupied 1387 (16.9%) of the 8226 available bed days. Length of stay predicted the risk of acquiring MRSA. Estimated from patients who completed each weekly screening cycle, the risk was 7.5% per week in the first week and 20.3% per week thereafter. The risk was not influenced by initial APACHE II score, the use of haemofiltration, or the number of MRSA-positive patients in the unit. The data suggest that a further 38 of those discharged between weekly screenings acquired MRSA, giving an incidence of 8.5%. MRSA was grown from blood in 17 patients, and from sputum in 53 (ICU-acquired in 18% and 47%). This study suggests that nearly 10% of admissions to a general ICU will be MRSA-positive, of whom only half will be identified before discharge. With standard prevention the risk of previously negative patients acquiring MRSA approximates to 1% per day in the first week and 3% per day thereafter, with nearly one-fifth progressing to bacteraemia; one-half will have MRSA in sputum. Patients with longer stays constitute a high-risk minority for whom additional measures such as decontamination with oropharyngeal and enteral vancomycin should be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.