ArticleHuman genetics2005
Linkage disequilibrium mapping in the Newfoundland population: a re-evaluation of the refinement of the Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1 critical interval.
Article in Human genetics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetically isolated populations, such as Newfoundland, have contributed greatly to the identification of disease-causing genes. A linkage disequilibrium (LD) study involving six Newfoundland families predicted a critical interval for Bardet-Biedl syndrome 1 (BBS1) (Young et al. in Am J Hum Genet 65:1680-1687, 1999), but the subsequent identification of BBS1 revealed that it lies outside this region. This suggested that either there is another gene responsible for BBS in these families or the Newfoundland population may not be ideal for LD studies. We screened these six Newfoundland families for mutations in BBS1 and found that affected individuals in five of them were homozygous for the same M390R mutation. There was no evidence for any BBS1 mutation in the affected individual in the sixth family. Therefore, one of the criteria for LD mapping was not met; namely, there should be a single disease-causing allele in the population. Haplotype analysis of unaffected individuals from south-west Newfoundland and English BBS1 patients homozygous for M390R, revealed that a second criterion for LD mapping was violated. The M390R mutation occurred in a common haplotype and both of these chromosomes, the ancestral wild-type and disease-causing haplotypes, were introduced to Newfoundland and spread by a founder effect. Moreover, it was found that disease-associated alleles occurred at relatively high frequencies in normal haplotypes and this probably accounted for the incorrect prediction in the previous LD study. Knowing the amount of genetic variation and its distribution in the Newfoundland population would be useful to maximize its potential for mapping hereditary disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.