Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15517243›Full record

ArticleImmunogenetics2004

Allograft rejection in the mixed cell reaction system of the demosponge Suberites domuncula is controlled by differential expression of apoptotic genes.

Matthias Wiens, Sanja Perović-Ottstadt, Isabel M Müller, Werner E G Müller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Immunogenetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Isolation and cultivation of fungal strains from in vitro cell cultures of two marine sponges (Porifera: Halichondrida and Haplosclerida).Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2011
    Article
  8. Lack of p21 expression links cell cycle control and appendage regeneration in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthias WiensInstitut für Physiologische Chemie, Abteilung Angewandte Molekularbiologie, Universität Mainz, Duesbergweg 6, 55099, Mainz, Germany.
Sanja Perović-Ottstadt
Isabel M Müller
Werner E G Müller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Until recently, the lack of molecular probes hampered the determination of the expression of pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic genes in sponge. In an approach to solve this problem, the present study describes a variety of cDNAs from the demosponge Suberites domuncula, coding for proteins that are characteristic for the initiation of apoptosis (caspase, MA3, ALG-2 protein), for the prevention of programmed cells death (2 Bcl-2 homology proteins, FAIM-related polypeptide, and DAD-1-related protein), and for morphogenetic processes (retinoid X receptor). They were used as probes to monitor the expression levels in vitro in the allogeneic mixed sponge cell reaction (MSCR) system. In the allogeneic MSCR, two-cell aggregates (primmorphs) from genetically different animals of the same species were positioned next to each other. After approximately 8 days in culture, one of the primmorphs underwent apoptotic death, while the second remained alive. The expression levels of the aforementioned genes were determined by Northern blotting and by in situ hybridization. These experiments revealed that in the apoptotic primmorph, the characteristic apoptotic genes were expressed, while in the non-apoptotic aggregates the cell-survival genes are highly upregulated. Interestingly, the transcript levels of retinoid X receptor were higher in apoptotic primmorphs than in the non-apoptotic aggregate in the assay. Our data show for the first time that in the in vitro MSCR system, allogeneic recognition led to apoptotic cell death in one partner, while the other one survived. We suggest that this process is controlled by a differential expression of the pro-apoptotic and pro-survival genes studied here.

Indexed as

ApoptosisGene Expression ProfilingGraft RejectionAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBlotting, NorthernCaspasesGenes, bcl-2Molecular Sequence DataPoriferaRetinoid X ReceptorsTransplantation, HomologousCaspasesRetinoid X Receptors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.