Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1551672›Full record

ArticleHuman genetics1992

Characterization of centromere arrangements and test for random distribution in G0, G1, S, G2, G1, and early S' phase in human lymphocytes.

R Weimer, T Haaf, J Krüger, M Poot, M Schmid

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human genetics, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. CENP-A Regulation and Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Population-based 3D genome structure analysis reveals driving forces in spatial genome organization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  11. Transcription and ncRNAs: at the cent(rome)re of kinetochore assembly and maintenance.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2013
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Quantitative analysis of cell nucleus organisation.PLoS computational biology · 2007
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Nuclear organization of centromeric domains is not perturbed by inhibition of histone deacetylases.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2004
    Article
  18. Three-dimensional arrangements of centromeres and telomeres in nuclei of human and murine lymphocytes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2003
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Non-Rabl patterns of centromere and telomere distribution in the interphase nuclei of plant cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 1998
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

R WeimerInstitut für Humangenetik, Universität, Biozentrum, Würzburg, Federal Republic of Germany.
T Haaf
J Krüger
M Poot
M Schmid
University of Würzburg · DEHeidelberg University · DEStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The arrangement of centromeres, cluster formation and association with the nucleolus and the nuclear membrane were characterized in human lymphocytes during the course of interphase in a cell-phase-dependent manner. We evaluated 3,893 cell nuclei categorized by five parameters. The centromeres were visualized by means of indirect immunofluorescent labeling with anti-centromere antibodies (ACA) contained in serum of patients with CREST syndrome. The cell nuclei were classified as G0, G1, S, G2, G1' and early S' phase by comparing microscopically identified groups of cell nuclei with flow cytometric determination of cell cycle stage of synchronized and unsynchronized lymphocyte cell cultures. Based on a discrimination analysis, a program was devised that calculated the probability for any cell nucleus belonging to the G0, G1, S, G2, G1' and early S' phase using only two microscopic parameters. Various characteristics were determined in the G0, S, and G2 stages. A transition stage to S phase within G1 was detected. This stage shows centromere arrangements not repeated in later cell cycles and which develop from the dissolution of centromere clusters in the periphery of the nucleus during G0 and G1. S phase exhibits various non-random centromere arrangements and associations of centromeres with the nucleolus. G1' and early S' phase of the second cell cycle display no characteristic centromere arrangement. The duplication of centromeres in G2 is asynchronous in two phases. For all cell phases a test for random distribution of the centromeres in the cell nucleus was performed. There is a distinct tendency for centromeres to be in a peripheral position during G0 and G1; this tendency becomes weaker in S phase. Although the visual impression is a seemingly random distribution of centromeres in G2 and G1', statistical analysis still demonstrates a significant deviation from random distribution in favor of a peripheral location. Only the early S phase of the second cell cycle shows no significant deviation from a random distribution.

Indexed as

CentromereCell CycleCell NucleusCells, CulturedFlow CytometryHumansLymphocytesMathematicsMicroscopy, FluorescenceStatistics as Topic

Identifiers

PMID1551672
OpenAlexW2031942175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.