ArticleJournal of bacteriology2004
Ligand-specific activation of Escherichia coli chemoreceptor transmethylation.
Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Signaling mechanism of the transmembrane energy receptor Aer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Methylation-Independent Chemotaxis Systems Are the Norm for Gastric-ColonizingJournal of bacteriology · 2022Article
- Behavioral Variability and Phenotypic Diversity in Bacterial Chemotaxis.Annual review of biophysics · 2018Review
- Information processing in bacteria: memory, computation, and statistical physics: a key issues review.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2016Review
- Universal response-adaptation relation in bacterial chemotaxis.Journal of bacteriology · 2015Article
- Mistic and TarCF as fusion protein partners for functional expression of the cannabinoid receptor 2 in Escherichia coli.Protein expression and purification · 2012Article
- Adapt locally and act globally: strategy to maintain high chemoreceptor sensitivity in complex environments.Molecular systems biology · 2011Article
- Methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine nucleosidase, a critical enzyme for bacterial metabolism.Molecular microbiology · 2011Review
- A modular gradient-sensing network for chemotaxis in Escherichia coli revealed by responses to time-varying stimuli.Molecular systems biology · 2010Article
- Kinase-active signaling complexes of bacterial chemoreceptors do not contain proposed receptor-receptor contacts observed in crystal structures.Biochemistry · 2010Article
- Comparative genomics of Geobacter chemotaxis genes reveals diverse signaling function.BMC genomics · 2008Article
- Receptor density balances signal stimulation and attenuation in membrane-assembled complexes of bacterial chemotaxis signaling proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2008Article
- Physical responses of bacterial chemoreceptors.Journal of molecular biology · 2007Article
- Self-assembly of receptor/signaling complexes in bacterial chemotaxis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006Article
- Site-specific and synergistic stimulation of methylation on the bacterial chemotaxis receptor Tsr by serine and CheW.BMC microbiology · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Adaptation in the chemosensory pathways of bacteria like Escherichia coli is mediated by the enzyme-catalyzed methylation (and demethylation) of glutamate residues in the signaling domains of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs). MCPs can be methylated in trans, where the methyltransferase (CheR) molecule catalyzing methyl group transfer is tethered to the C terminus of a neighboring receptor. Here, it was shown that E. coli cells exhibited adaptation to attractant stimuli mediated through either engineered or naturally occurring MCPs that were unable to tether CheR as long as another MCP capable of tethering CheR was also present, e.g., either the full-length aspartate or serine receptor (Tar or Tsr). Methylation of isolated membrane samples in which engineered tethering and substrate receptors were coexpressed demonstrated that the truncated substrate receptors (trTsr) were efficiently methylated in the presence of tethering receptors (Tar with methylation sites blocked) relative to samples in which none of the MCPs had tethering sites. The effects of ligand binding on methylation were investigated, and an increase in rate was produced only with serine (the ligand specific for the substrate receptor trTsr); no significant change in rate was produced by aspartate (the ligand specific for the tethering receptor Tar). Although the overall efficiency of methylation was lower, receptor-specific effects were also observed in trTar- and trTsr-containing samples, where neither Tar nor Tsr possessed the CheR binding site at the C terminus. Altogether, the results are consistent with a ligand-induced conformational change that is limited to the methylated receptor dimer and does not spread to adjacent receptor dimers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.