Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15516464›Full record

ArticleThorax2004

When can personal best peak flow be determined for asthma action plans?

H K Reddel, G B Marks, C R Jenkins

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thorax, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06116292 (Impact of the Implementation of a Telemedicine Program on Patients Diagnosed with Asthma), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06116292 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Impact of the Implementation of a Telemedicine Program on Patients Diagnosed with Asthma

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Universitari de BellvitgeRan2024 to 2026Enrolled108ConditionsAsthma, Telemedicine, Adherence, Treatment, Quality of LifeArmsThe mobile application ESTOI for Asthmatic patients
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

H K ReddelWoolcock Institute of Medical Research, Camperdown, NSW, Australia. hkr@woolcock.org.au
G B Marks
C R Jenkins

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWritten asthma action plans based on personal best peak expiratory flow (PEF) consistently improve health outcomes, whereas those based on predicted PEF do not. Guidelines state that personal best PEF should be assessed over 2-3 weeks during good asthma control, but it is unclear how long to wait after commencing or changing treatment.

methodsElectronically recorded spirometric data from 61 subjects with initially poorly controlled asthma from a 72 week budesonide study were analysed. For each week, average morning pre-bronchodilator PEF was calculated and personal best PEF was determined as the highest PEF in the previous 2 weeks. The time to plateau was defined as the week beyond which no further improvement occurred.

resultsAt baseline, average morning PEF was 61% predicted and personal best PEF was 87% predicted. Personal best PEF from twice daily monitoring increased to a plateau of 95% predicted (p<0.0001) after only 3 weeks of budesonide treatment. However, average morning PEF continued to improve for 3 months and "as needed" reliever use for 7 months.

conclusionsPersonal best PEF is a useful concept for asthma self-management plans when determined as the highest PEF over the previous 2 weeks. With twice daily monitoring, personal best PEF reaches plateau levels after only a few weeks of corticosteroid treatment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsBudesonideHumansMiddle AgedPeak Expiratory Flow RatePredictive Value of TestsBronchodilator AgentsBudesonide

Identifiers

PMID15516464
PMCPMC1746886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.