Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15514889›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2004

Comparison of microsatellites versus single-nucleotide polymorphisms in a genome linkage screen for prostate cancer-susceptibility Loci.

Daniel J Schaid, Jennifer C Guenther, Gerald B Christensen, Scott Hebbring, Carsten Rosenow, Christopher A Hilker, Shannon K McDonnell, Julie M Cunningham, Susan L Slager, Michael L Blute and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human genetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genetic studies of stuttering in a founder population.Journal of fluency disorders · 2007
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. DNA-based Determination of Ancestry in Cynomolgus Macaques (Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2018
    Article
  5. Genetic diversity of Afrikaner cattle in southern Africa.Tropical animal health and production · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A pipeline for copy number variation detection based on principal component analysis.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2011
    Article
  18. Integrated genomic analysis of sézary syndrome.Genetics research international · 2011
    Article
  19. Article
  20. A recessive gene for primary vesicoureteral reflux maps to chromosome 12p11-q13.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2009
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel J SchaidDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. schaid@mayo.edu
Jennifer C Guenther
Gerald B Christensen
Scott Hebbring
Carsten Rosenow
Christopher A Hilker
Shannon K McDonnell
Julie M Cunningham
Susan L Slager
Michael L Blute
Stephen N Thibodeau
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Prostate Cancer Susceptibility: The ICPCG StudyU01CA089600 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI THIBODEAU, STEPHEN NORMAN · 2002 to 2016
$27.3M
Utility of serum and Tissue Biomarkers for Predicting Response to Androgen DeprivP50CA091956 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI TINDALL, DONALD J. · 2001 to 2010
$23.4M
LOCALIZATION OF SUSCEPTIBILITY LOCI IN PROSTATE CANCERR01CA072818 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC COLL OF MEDICINE, ROCHESTER · PI THIBODEAU, STEPHEN NORMAN · 1997 to 2005
$1.9M
Statistical Genetic Methods for Cancer Gene StudiesK07CA094919 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI SLAGER, SUSAN L · 2002 to 2006
$663k
NCI NIH HHS CA72818NCI NIH HHS CA89600NCI NIH HHS CA91956NCI NIH HHS CA94919NCI NIH HHS K07 CA094919NCI NIH HHS N01 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA091956NCI NIH HHS R01 CA072818NCI NIH HHS U01 CA089600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers among men and has long been recognized to occur in familial clusters. Brothers and sons of affected men have a 2-3-fold increased risk of developing prostate cancer. However, identification of genetic susceptibility loci for prostate cancer has been extremely difficult. Although the suggestion of linkage has been reported for many chromosomes, the most promising regions have been difficult to replicate. In this study, we compare genome linkage scans using microsatellites with those using single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), performed in 467 men with prostate cancer from 167 families. For the microsatellites, the ABI Prism Linkage Mapping Set version 2, with 402 microsatellite markers, was used, and, for the SNPs, the Early Access Affymetrix Mapping 10K array was used. Our results show that the presence of linkage disequilibrium (LD) among SNPs can lead to inflated LOD scores, and this seems to be an artifact due to the assumption of linkage equilibrium that is required by the current genetic-linkage software. After excluding SNPs with high LD, we found a number of new LOD-score peaks with values of at least 2.0 that were not found by the microsatellite markers: chromosome 8, with a maximum model-free LOD score of 2.2; chromosome 2, with a LOD score of 2.1; chromosome 6, with a LOD score of 4.2; and chromosome 12, with a LOD score of 3.9. The LOD scores for chromosomes 6 and 12 are difficult to interpret, because they occurred only at the extreme ends of the chromosomes. The greatest gain provided by the SNP markers was a large increase in the linkage information content, with an average information content of 61% for the SNPs, versus an average of 41% for the microsatellite markers. The strengths and weaknesses of microsatellite versus SNP markers are illustrated by the results of our genome linkage scans.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenetic LinkageGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansLod ScoreMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID15514889
PMCPMC1182157
OpenAlexW2046317441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.