SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2004
What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence based medicine changes anything? A systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 208 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
208 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Approaches to teaching evidence-based medicine in residency: a systematic review.Medical education online · 2025Pooled it
- Interventions for recurrent embryo implantation failure: An umbrella review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of educational strategies to teach evidence-based dentistry to undergraduate dental students: a systematic review.Evidence-based dentistry · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic review of the effectiveness of journal clubs in undergraduate medicine.Canadian medical education journal · 2023Pooled it
- Methods of teaching evidence-based practice: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A systematic review and taxonomy of tools for evaluating evidence-based medicine teaching in medical education.Systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Theory-based strategies for teaching evidence-based practice to undergraduate health students: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2019Pooled it
- Prescribers' Knowledge and Skills for Interpreting Research Results: A Systematic Review.The Journal of continuing education in the health professions · 2017Pooled it
- Effectiveness of training in evidence-based medicine skills for healthcare professionals: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2016Pooled it
- Improving the uptake of systematic reviews: a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and relevance.BMJ open · 2014Pooled it
- Teaching critical appraisal skills in healthcare settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Evidence based post graduate training. A systematic review of reviews based on the WFME quality framework.BMC medical education · 2011Pooled it
- How are "teaching the teachers" courses in evidence based medicine evaluated? A systematic review.BMC medical education · 2010Pooled it
- Interventions to improve question formulation in professional practice and self-directed learning.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010Pooled it
- Evidence based practice in postgraduate healthcare education: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2007Pooled it
- An integrated clinical-research training model for professional master's degree postgraduate medical students: a controlled educational study.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Similar Outcomes of Web-Based and Face-to-Face Training of the GRADE Approach for the Certainty of Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Trial
- Trial
148 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effects of standalone versus clinically integrated teaching in evidence based medicine on various outcomes in postgraduates.
designSystematic review of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and before and after comparison studies. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, ERIC, Cochrane Library, DARE, HTA database, Best Evidence, BEME, and SCI. STUDY SELECTION: 23 studies: four randomised trials, seven non-randomised controlled studies, and 12 before and after comparison studies. 18 studies (including two randomised trials) evaluated a standalone teaching method, and five studies (including two randomised trials) evaluated a clinically integrated teaching method.
main outcome measuresKnowledge, critical appraisal skills, attitudes, and behaviour.
resultsStandalone teaching improved knowledge but not skills, attitudes, or behaviour. Clinically integrated teaching improved knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviour.
conclusionTeaching of evidence based medicine should be moved from classrooms to clinical practice to achieve improvements in substantial outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.