Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15511299›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2004

Cross-species hybridisation of human and bovine orthologous genes on high density cDNA microarrays.

James Adjaye, Ralf Herwig, Doris Herrmann, Wasco Wruck, Alia Benkahla, Thore C Brink, Monika Nowak, Joseph W Carnwath, Claus Hultschig, Heiner Niemann and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Nuclear reprogramming in heterokaryons is rapid, extensive, and bidirectional.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2009
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Expression profiling of drug response--from genes to pathways.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2006
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James AdjayeMax Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Department of Vertebrate Genomics, Ihnestrasse 73, D-14195, Berlin, Germany. adjaye@molgen.mpg.de
Ralf Herwig
Doris Herrmann
Wasco Wruck
Alia Benkahla
Thore C Brink
Monika Nowak
Joseph W Carnwath
Claus Hultschig
Heiner Niemann
Hans Lehrach
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCross-species gene-expression comparison is a powerful tool for the discovery of evolutionarily conserved mechanisms and pathways of expression control. The usefulness of cDNA microarrays in this context is that broad areas of homology are compared and hybridization probes are sufficiently large that small inter-species differences in nucleotide sequence would not affect the analytical results. This comparative genomics approach would allow a common set of genes within a specific developmental, metabolic, or disease-related gene pathway to be evaluated in experimental models of human diseases. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility and reproducibility of cross-species analysis employing a human cDNA microarray as probe.

resultsAs a proof of principle, total RNA derived from human and bovine fetal brains was used as a source of labelled targets for hybridisation onto a human cDNA microarray composed of 349 characterised genes. Each gene was spotted 20 times representing 6,980 data points thus enabling highly reproducible spot quantification. Employing high stringency hybridisation and washing conditions, followed by data analysis, revealed slight differences in the expression levels and reproducibility of the signals between the two species. We also assigned each of the genes into three expression level categories- i.e. high, medium and low. The correlation co-efficient of cross hybridisation between the orthologous genes was 0.94. Verification of the array data by semi-quantitative RT-PCR using common primer sequences enabled co-amplification of both human and bovine transcripts. Finally, we were able to assign gene names to previously uncharacterised bovine ESTs.

conclusionsResults of our study demonstrate the harnessing and utilisation power of comparative genomics and prove the feasibility of using human microarrays to facilitate the identification of co-expressed orthologous genes in common tissues derived from different species.

Indexed as

Sequence Homology, Nucleic AcidAnimalsBrainBrain ChemistryCattleDNA, ComplementaryEvolution, MolecularFeasibility StudiesGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenesGenetic VariationHumansMicroarray AnalysisNucleic Acid HybridizationDNA, Complementary

Identifiers

PMID15511299
PMCPMC535340
OpenAlexW1573961429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.