Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15510684›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2004

The variability of serological and molecular diagnosis of feline immunodeficiency virus infection.

D Bienzle, F Reggeti, X Wen, S Little, J Hobson, S Kruth

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Seroprevalence of feline leukemia virus and feline immunodeficiency virus infection among cats in Canada.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2009
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D BienzleDepartment of Pathobiology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W.
F Reggeti
X Wen
S Little
J Hobson
S Kruth

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis of feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) infection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has recently become available, but little is known about the performance of this assay. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of PCR diagnosis of FIV infection. Replicate aliquots of blood samples from cats identified as FIV positive or negative by 2 previous enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) results, and from clinically healthy dogs, were submitted to different laboratories for FIV serologic diagnosis and PCR. The PCR products obtained in 1 laboratory were sequenced to determine the FIV subtype. The PCR assays correctly identified 100%, 80%, and 50% of the FIV-positive samples, and 100%, 90%, and 70% of FIV-negative samples. Each dog sample was reported as FIV PCR positive at least once, and FIV subtypes A, B, and C were identified. It was concluded that PCR tests currently available for FIV infection are unreliable, with highly variable sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCatsDogsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFeline Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeImmunodeficiency Virus, FelinePolymerase Chain ReactionPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic Tests

Identifiers

PMID15510684
PMCPMC545975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.