ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2004
Genetic equity.
Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: Current Status and Future Challenges of Biobank Data Analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- One community's effort to control genetic disease.American journal of public health · 2012Article
- Biomarkers: better donor protection.Nature · 2011Article
- Consequentialism without consequences: ethics and embryo research.Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees · 2010Article
- An ethical framework for stem cell research in the European Union.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2005Article
- Exploring the concept of genetic discrimination.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2005Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes, elaborates and defends a principle of genetic equity. In doing so it articulates, explains and justifies what might be meant by the concept of 'human dignity' in a way that is clear, defensible and consistent with, but by no means the same as, the plethora of appeals to human dignity found in contemporary bioethics, and more particularly in international instruments on bioethics. We propose the following principle of genetic equity: humans are born equal; they are entitled to freedom from discrimination and equality of opportunity to flourish; genetic information may not be used to limit that equality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15510171What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.