Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15507307›Full record

ArticleVeterinary immunology and immunopathology2004

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus field isolates differ in in vitro interferon phenotypes.

Sang-Myeong Lee, Susan K Schommer, Steven B Kleiboeker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary immunology and immunopathology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sang-Myeong LeeDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, 1600 E. Rollins, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Susan K Schommer
Steven B Kleiboeker
Missouri College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Type I interferons (IFN-alpha and -beta) play an important role in the innate host defense against viral infection by inducing antiviral responses. In addition to direct antiviral activities, type I IFN serves as an important link between the innate and adaptive immune response through multiple mechanisms. Therefore, the outcome of a viral infection can be affected by IFN induction and the IFN sensitivity of a virus. North American porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) field isolates were studied with regard to IFN-alpha sensitivity and induction in order to understand the role of type I IFN in PRRSV pathogenesis. PRRSV isolates were differentially sensitive to porcine recombinant IFN-alpha (rIFN-alpha) and varied in their ability to induce IFN-alpha in porcine alveolar macrophages (PAM) cultures as measured by a porcine IFN-alpha specific ELISA on cell culture supernatants. Fifty-two plaques were purified from three PRRSV isolates (numbers 3, 7, and 12) and tested for IFN sensitivity and IFN induction. Plaque-derived populations were composed of heterogeneous populations in terms of IFN-inducing capacity and sensitivity to rIFN-alpha. When macrophages infected with isolates 3, 7, or 12 were treated with polycytidylic acid (polyI:C), IFN-alpha production was enhanced. Cells infected with isolate 3 and treated with polyI:C showed the most consistent and strongest enhancement of IFN-alpha production. It was demonstrated that the relatively low concentrations of IFN-alpha produced by isolate 3 contributed to the enhanced IFN-alpha synthesis in response to polyI:C. Isolates 7 and 12 significantly suppressed the enhanced IFN-alpha production by isolate 3 in polyI:C treated cells. To determine if suppression was at the level of IFN-alpha transcription, quantitative RT-PCR was performed for IFN-alpha mRNA and compared to GAPDH and cyclophilin mRNA quantification. However, the relative number of IFN-alpha transcript copies did not correlate with IFN-alpha protein levels, suggesting a post-transcriptional mechanism of suppression. In summary, these results demonstrate that PRRSV field isolates differ both in IFN-alpha sensitivity and induction. Furthermore, a PRRSV field isolate strongly enhance polyI:C-induced IFN-alpha production in PAM cultures and this priming effect was suppressed by other PRRSV isolates.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCells, CulturedChlorocebus aethiopsGenetic VariationInterferon-alphaMacrophages, AlveolarPhenotypePorcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusSwineTime FactorsInterferon-alpha

Identifiers

PMID15507307
PMCPMC7112598
OpenAlexW2016452561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.