Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15507306›Full record

ArticleVeterinary immunology and immunopathology2004

Deciphering the involvement of innate immune factors in the development of the host response to PRRSV vaccination.

Atabak R Royaee, Robert J Husmann, Harry D Dawson, Gabriela Calzada-Nova, William M Schnitzlein, Federico A Zuckermann, Joan K Lunney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary immunology and immunopathology, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Field Studies on theVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Safety and immunomodulatory efficacy of heat-killedFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Is Oral Vaccination againstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Oral and Parenteral Vaccination againstAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  16. Effect of FeedingAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Atabak R RoyaeeAnimal Parasitic Disease Laboratory, Animal and Natural Resources Institute, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, ARS, BARC, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Robert J Husmann
Harry D Dawson
Gabriela Calzada-Nova
William M Schnitzlein
Federico A Zuckermann
Joan K Lunney
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USBeltsville Human Nutrition Research Center · USAgricultural Research Service · USUrbana University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The natural response of pigs to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) infections and vaccinations needs to be altered so that better protection is afforded against both homologous and heterologous challenges by this pathogen. To address this problem, real-time gene expression assays were coupled with cytokine Elispot and protein analyses to assess the nature of the anti-PRRSV response of pigs immunized with modified live virus (MLV) vaccine. Although T helper 1 (Th1) immunity was elicited in all vaccinated animals, as evidenced by the genesis of PRRSV-specific interferon-gamma secreting cells (IFNG SC), the overall extent of the memory response was variable and generally weak. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) isolated from these pigs responded to PRRSV exposure with a limited increase in their expression of the Th1 immune markers, IFNG, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-15 (IL15), and a reduction in the quantity of mRNAs encoding the innate and inflammatory proteins, IL1B, IL8 and IFNA. Efforts to enhance Th1 immunity, by utilizing an expression plasmid encoding porcine IFNA (pINA) as an adjuvant, resulted in a temporary increase in the frequency of PRRSV-specific IFNG SC but only minor changes overall in the expression of Th1 associated cytokine or innate immune marker mRNA by virus-stimulated PBMC. Administration of pINA, however, did correlate with decreased IL1B secretion by cultured, unstimulated PBMC but had no effect on their ability to release IFNG. Thus, while exogenous addition of IFNA during PRRSV vaccination has an impact on the development of a Th1 immune response, other alterations will be required for substantial boosting of virus-specific protection.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsCytokinesGene Expression RegulationImmunity, CellularInterferon-alphaMacrophagesPlasmidsPorcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusRegression AnalysisSwineTime FactorsUp-RegulationVaccines, AttenuatedViral VaccinesAdjuvants, ImmunologicCytokinesInterferon-alphaVaccines, AttenuatedViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID15507306
PMCPMC7112652
OpenAlexW2144937592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.